[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <821647de-be45-557a-e1eb-2e70e186f2d8@undef.tools>
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2022 08:01:52 +1000
From: Jarrah Gosbell <kernel@...ef.tools>
To: Peter Geis <pgwipeout@...il.com>
Cc: Jacob Chen <jacob-chen@...wrt.com>,
Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel@...guardiasur.com.ar>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
Linux Media Mailing List <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..." <linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org>,
arm-mail-list <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
phone-devel@...r.kernel.org, Ondrej Jirman <megi@....cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] media: rockchip: rga: Fix probe rga_parse_dt bugs
On 8/14/22 23:12, Peter Geis wrote:
>> ret = rga_parse_dt(rga);
>> - if (ret)
>> + if (ret) {
>> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Unable to parse OF data\n");
> If this can return EPROBE_DEFER, shouldn't this be dev_err_probe
> instead of dev_err?
Looking into it that does make more sense. I suspect it wasn't done this
way originally because dev_err_probe isn't used elsewhere in rga.c. I'll
send a v2 with that change shortly.
Thanks for the review.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists