linux-kernel - Re: (subset) [PATCH v1 1/5] regmap: mmio: Don't unprepare attached clock

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <166058536606.839346.1513878087140672898.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date:   Mon, 15 Aug 2022 18:42:46 +0100
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Aidan MacDonald <aidanmacdonald.0x0@...il.com>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: (subset) [PATCH v1 1/5] regmap: mmio: Don't unprepare attached clock

On Fri, 5 Aug 2022 23:53:17 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> The commit eb4a219d19fd ("regmap: Skip clk_put for attached clocks when
> freeing context") oexcluded clk_put() call on regmap freeing. But the
> same is needed for clk_unprepare() since the regmap MMIO users should
> call regmap_mmio_detach_clk() which does unprepare the clock. Update
> the code accordingly, so neither clk_put() nor clk_unprepare() would
> be called for the attached clock.
> 
> [...]

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/regmap.git for-next

Thanks!

[3/5] regmap: mmio: Remove mmio_relaxed member from context
      commit: ada79bca380009a85d1e643e5a4da0c079f28225

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark