linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] regmap: mmio: Extending to support IO ports

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 15 Aug 2022 18:42:47 +0100
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Aidan MacDonald <aidanmacdonald.0x0@...il.com>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     William Breathitt Gray <william.gray@...aro.org>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] regmap: mmio: Extending to support IO ports

On Mon, 8 Aug 2022 23:33:56 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> Currently regmap MMIO doesn't support IO ports, while being inconsistent
> in used IO accessors. Fix the latter and extend framework with the
> former.
> 
> Changelog v2:
> - dropped the first two patches (Mark)
> - split the last patch to two (Mark)
> 
> [...]

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/regmap.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/4] regmap: mmio: Remove mmio_relaxed member from context
      commit: ada79bca380009a85d1e643e5a4da0c079f28225
[2/4] regmap: mmio: Get rid of broken 64-bit IO
      commit: 159dfabd207628c983e0c3c5ef607f496ff5e6a5
[3/4] regmap: mmio: Introduce IO accessors that can talk to IO port
      commit: 93ce557679e1cf7742ad327d40a1499e7d8535b7
[4/4] regmap: mmio: Fix MMIO accessors to avoid talking to IO port
      commit: 7e7ba58c94127efa97c249e38cc2d1c0ed78b58f

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark