[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3f9402d1-6dc8-5f64-dfce-3fb895b80bc1@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2022 11:28:46 +0200
From: Cezary Rojewski <cezary.rojewski@...el.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
CC: Péter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...ux.intel.com>,
"Andy Shevchenko" <andy@...nel.org>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
"ALSA Development Mailing List" <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
<amadeuszx.slawinski@...ux.intel.com>,
Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@...ux.intel.com>,
"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
"Kai Vehmanen" <kai.vehmanen@...ux.intel.com>,
Bard Liao <yung-chuan.liao@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] lib/string_helpers: Introduce strsplit_u32()
On 2022-08-09 5:23 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 9, 2022 at 11:55 AM Cezary Rojewski
> <cezary.rojewski@...el.com> wrote:
...
>
> I guess this may be simplified with memdup_user(). Otherwise it looks like that.
...
> (You don't use ppos here, so it's pointless to use
> simple_write_to_buffer(), right? I have noticed this pattern in SOF
> code, which might be simplified the same way as I suggested above)
Hello Andy,
Given the two major suggestions (memdup_user() and re-using
get_options()) that had a major impact on the patch are both provided by
you, would you like me to add any tags to the commit message? I'm
speaking of Suggested-by or Co-developed-by and such. In you choose
'yes', please specify tags to be added.
By the way, I've provided 'the final form' on thesofproject/linux as PR
[1] to see if no regression is caused in basic scenarios.
[1]: https://github.com/thesofproject/linux/pull/3812
Regards,
Czarek
Powered by blists - more mailing lists