[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Yvt/hZYfSvlCbU02@nvidia.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2022 08:29:09 -0300
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
To: Alistair Popple <apopple@...dia.com>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Sierra Guiza, Alejandro (Alex)" <alex.sierra@....com>,
Chaitanya Kulkarni <kch@...dia.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Felix Kuehling <Felix.Kuehling@....com>,
John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>,
Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com>,
Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>,
Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>,
Ralph Campbell <rcampbell@...dia.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] mm/gup.c: Refactor
check_and_migrate_movable_pages()
On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 03:29:20PM +1000, Alistair Popple wrote:
> >> +static long check_and_migrate_movable_pages(unsigned long nr_pages,
> >> + struct page **pages)
> >> +{
> >> + int ret;
> >> + unsigned long collected;
> >> + LIST_HEAD(movable_page_list);
> >> +
> >> + collected = collect_longterm_unpinnable_pages(&movable_page_list, nr_pages, pages);
> >> + if (!collected)
> >> + return 0;
> >> +
> >> + ret = migrate_longterm_unpinnable_pages(&movable_page_list, nr_pages, pages);
> >> + if (!ret)
> >> + return -EAGAIN;
> >> + else
> >> + return ret;
> >
> > I would drop the else path and just return zero
>
> Unless I've misunderstood you I don't think that's correct though.
> check_and_migrate_movable_pages() needs to return one of 3 conditions:
>
> - 0: All pages are in the correct zone and are still pinned (ie. "success").
> - -EAGAIN: Some pages were migrated, all pages need re-pinning.
> - errno: Migration failed, pins were dropped and PUP should fail.
>
> John's suggested comment update spells this out more clearly.
But that is not what it does..
if (!ret) == if (ret != 0)
return -EAGAIN
thus ret == 0
return ret == return 0
Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists