lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87wnb7tycb.fsf@nvdebian.thelocal>
Date:   Wed, 17 Aug 2022 12:01:58 +1000
From:   Alistair Popple <apopple@...dia.com>
To:     Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
Cc:     linux-mm@...ck.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        "Sierra Guiza, Alejandro (Alex)" <alex.sierra@....com>,
        Chaitanya Kulkarni <kch@...dia.com>,
        Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
        Felix Kuehling <Felix.Kuehling@....com>,
        John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>,
        Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com>,
        Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>,
        Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>,
        Ralph Campbell <rcampbell@...dia.com>,
        David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] mm/gup.c: Refactor
 check_and_migrate_movable_pages()


Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com> writes:

> On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 03:29:20PM +1000, Alistair Popple wrote:
>
>> >> +static long check_and_migrate_movable_pages(unsigned long nr_pages,
>> >> +					    struct page **pages)
>> >> +{
>> >> +	int ret;
>> >> +	unsigned long collected;
>> >> +	LIST_HEAD(movable_page_list);
>> >> +
>> >> +	collected = collect_longterm_unpinnable_pages(&movable_page_list, nr_pages, pages);
>> >> +	if (!collected)
>> >> +		return 0;
>> >> +
>> >> +	ret = migrate_longterm_unpinnable_pages(&movable_page_list, nr_pages, pages);
>> >> +	if (!ret)
>> >> +		return -EAGAIN;
>> >> +	else
>> >> +		return ret;
>> >
>> > I would drop the else path and just return zero
>>
>> Unless I've misunderstood you I don't think that's correct though.
>> check_and_migrate_movable_pages() needs to return one of 3 conditions:
>>
>>  - 0: All pages are in the correct zone and are still pinned (ie. "success").
>>  - -EAGAIN: Some pages were migrated, all pages need re-pinning.
>>  - errno: Migration failed, pins were dropped and PUP should fail.
>>
>> John's suggested comment update spells this out more clearly.
>
> But that is not what it does..
>
> if (!ret) == if (ret != 0)

Huh? Unless I'm misinterpretting you or am really behind on coffee
if (!ret) is equivalent to if (ret == 0), not if (ret != 0).

Ie:

if (ret == 0)
    return -EAGAIN;
else
    return !0;

Thus we will never return 0 from the above snippet.

>         return -EAGAIN
> thus ret == 0
> return ret == return 0
>
> Jason

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ