[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHC9VhT0D=qtaYR-Ve1hRTtQXspuC09qQZyFdESj-tQstyvMFg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2022 20:22:04 -0400
From: Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>
To: Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@...hat.com>
Cc: Linux-Audit Mailing List <linux-audit@...hat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, Eric Paris <eparis@...isplace.org>,
Steve Grubb <sgrubb@...hat.com>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
Amir Goldstein <amir73il@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/4] fanotify,audit: Allow audit to use the full
permission event response
On Tue, Aug 9, 2022 at 1:23 PM Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> This patch passes the full value so that the audit function can use all
> of it. The audit function was updated to log the additional information in
> the AUDIT_FANOTIFY record. The following is an example of the new record
> format:
>
> type=FANOTIFY msg=audit(1600385147.372:590): resp=2 fan_type=1 fan_info=17
>
> Suggested-by: Steve Grubb <sgrubb@...hat.com>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/3075502.aeNJFYEL58@x2
> Signed-off-by: Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@...hat.com>
> ---
> fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify.c | 3 ++-
> include/linux/audit.h | 9 +++++----
> kernel/auditsc.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> 3 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
You've hopefully already seen the kernel test robot build warning, so
I won't bring that up again, but a few comments below ...
> diff --git a/fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify.c b/fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify.c
> index 0f36062521f4..36c3ed1af085 100644
> --- a/fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify.c
> +++ b/fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify.c
> @@ -276,7 +276,8 @@ static int fanotify_get_response(struct fsnotify_group *group,
>
> /* Check if the response should be audited */
> if (event->response & FAN_AUDIT)
> - audit_fanotify(event->response & ~FAN_AUDIT);
> + audit_fanotify(event->response & ~FAN_AUDIT,
> + event->info_len, event->info_buf);
>
> pr_debug("%s: group=%p event=%p about to return ret=%d\n", __func__,
> group, event, ret);
> diff --git a/include/linux/audit.h b/include/linux/audit.h
> index 3ea198a2cd59..c69efdba12ca 100644
> --- a/include/linux/audit.h
> +++ b/include/linux/audit.h
> @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
> #include <linux/audit_arch.h>
> #include <uapi/linux/audit.h>
> #include <uapi/linux/netfilter/nf_tables.h>
> +#include <uapi/linux/fanotify.h>
>
> #define AUDIT_INO_UNSET ((unsigned long)-1)
> #define AUDIT_DEV_UNSET ((dev_t)-1)
> @@ -417,7 +418,7 @@ extern void __audit_log_capset(const struct cred *new, const struct cred *old);
> extern void __audit_mmap_fd(int fd, int flags);
> extern void __audit_openat2_how(struct open_how *how);
> extern void __audit_log_kern_module(char *name);
> -extern void __audit_fanotify(u32 response);
> +extern void __audit_fanotify(u32 response, size_t len, char *buf);
> extern void __audit_tk_injoffset(struct timespec64 offset);
> extern void __audit_ntp_log(const struct audit_ntp_data *ad);
> extern void __audit_log_nfcfg(const char *name, u8 af, unsigned int nentries,
> @@ -524,10 +525,10 @@ static inline void audit_log_kern_module(char *name)
> __audit_log_kern_module(name);
> }
>
> -static inline void audit_fanotify(u32 response)
> +static inline void audit_fanotify(u32 response, size_t len, char *buf)
> {
> if (!audit_dummy_context())
> - __audit_fanotify(response);
> + __audit_fanotify(response, len, buf);
> }
>
> static inline void audit_tk_injoffset(struct timespec64 offset)
> @@ -684,7 +685,7 @@ static inline void audit_log_kern_module(char *name)
> {
> }
>
> -static inline void audit_fanotify(u32 response)
> +static inline void audit_fanotify(u32 response, size_t len, char *buf)
> { }
>
> static inline void audit_tk_injoffset(struct timespec64 offset)
> diff --git a/kernel/auditsc.c b/kernel/auditsc.c
> index 433418d73584..f000fec52360 100644
> --- a/kernel/auditsc.c
> +++ b/kernel/auditsc.c
> @@ -64,6 +64,7 @@
> #include <uapi/linux/limits.h>
> #include <uapi/linux/netfilter/nf_tables.h>
> #include <uapi/linux/openat2.h> // struct open_how
> +#include <uapi/linux/fanotify.h>
>
> #include "audit.h"
>
> @@ -2899,10 +2900,34 @@ void __audit_log_kern_module(char *name)
> context->type = AUDIT_KERN_MODULE;
> }
>
> -void __audit_fanotify(u32 response)
> +void __audit_fanotify(u32 response, size_t len, char *buf)
> {
> - audit_log(audit_context(), GFP_KERNEL,
> - AUDIT_FANOTIFY, "resp=%u", response);
> + struct fanotify_response_info_audit_rule *friar;
> + size_t c = len;
> + char *ib = buf;
> +
> + if (!(len && buf)) {
> + audit_log(audit_context(), GFP_KERNEL, AUDIT_FANOTIFY,
> + "resp=%u fan_type=0 fan_info=?", response);
> + return;
> + }
> + while (c >= sizeof(struct fanotify_response_info_header)) {
> + friar = (struct fanotify_response_info_audit_rule *)buf;
Since the only use of this at the moment is the
fanotify_response_info_rule, why not pass the
fanotify_response_info_rule struct directly into this function? We
can always change it if we need to in the future without affecting
userspace, and it would simplify the code.
> + switch (friar->hdr.type) {
> + case FAN_RESPONSE_INFO_AUDIT_RULE:
> + if (friar->hdr.len < sizeof(*friar)) {
> + audit_log(audit_context(), GFP_KERNEL, AUDIT_FANOTIFY,
> + "resp=%u fan_type=%u fan_info=(incomplete)",
> + response, friar->hdr.type);
> + return;
> + }
> + audit_log(audit_context(), GFP_KERNEL, AUDIT_FANOTIFY,
> + "resp=%u fan_type=%u fan_info=%u",
> + response, friar->hdr.type, friar->audit_rule);
> + }
> + c -= friar->hdr.len;
> + ib += friar->hdr.len;
> + }
> }
>
> void __audit_tk_injoffset(struct timespec64 offset)
> --
> 2.27.0
--
paul-moore.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists