linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v8 095/103] KVM: TDX: Handle TDX PV rdmsr/wrmsr hypercall

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 17 Aug 2022 15:40:24 -0700
From:   Sagi Shahar <sagis@...gle.com>
To:     "Yamahata, Isaku" <isaku.yamahata@...el.com>
Cc:     kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@...il.com>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        Erdem Aktas <erdemaktas@...gle.com>,
        Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 095/103] KVM: TDX: Handle TDX PV rdmsr/wrmsr hypercall

On Sun, Aug 7, 2022 at 3:03 PM <isaku.yamahata@...el.com> wrote:
>
> From: Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@...el.com>
>
> Wire up TDX PV rdmsr/wrmsr hypercall to the KVM backend function.
>
> Signed-off-by: Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@...el.com>
> Reviewed-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kvm/vmx/tdx.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 39 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/tdx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/tdx.c
> index 341c29385544..fdd0609bd01b 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/tdx.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/tdx.c
> @@ -1157,6 +1157,41 @@ static int tdx_emulate_mmio(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>         return 1;
>  }
>
> +static int tdx_emulate_rdmsr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +{
> +       u32 index = tdvmcall_a0_read(vcpu);
> +       u64 data;
> +
> +       if (!kvm_msr_allowed(vcpu, index, KVM_MSR_FILTER_READ) ||
> +           kvm_get_msr(vcpu, index, &data)) {
> +               trace_kvm_msr_read_ex(index);
> +               tdvmcall_set_return_code(vcpu, TDG_VP_VMCALL_INVALID_OPERAND);
> +               return 1;
> +       }
> +       trace_kvm_msr_read(index, data);
> +
> +       tdvmcall_set_return_code(vcpu, TDG_VP_VMCALL_SUCCESS);
> +       tdvmcall_set_return_val(vcpu, data);
> +       return 1;
> +}
> +
> +static int tdx_emulate_wrmsr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +{
> +       u32 index = tdvmcall_a0_read(vcpu);
> +       u64 data = tdvmcall_a1_read(vcpu);
> +
> +       if (!kvm_msr_allowed(vcpu, index, KVM_MSR_FILTER_READ) ||
                                                                   ^
This should be KVM_MSR_FILTER_WRITE

> +           kvm_set_msr(vcpu, index, data)) {
> +               trace_kvm_msr_write_ex(index, data);
> +               tdvmcall_set_return_code(vcpu, TDG_VP_VMCALL_INVALID_OPERAND);
> +               return 1;
> +       }
> +
> +       trace_kvm_msr_write(index, data);
> +       tdvmcall_set_return_code(vcpu, TDG_VP_VMCALL_SUCCESS);
> +       return 1;
> +}
> +
>  static int handle_tdvmcall(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  {
>         if (tdvmcall_exit_type(vcpu))
> @@ -1171,6 +1206,10 @@ static int handle_tdvmcall(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>                 return tdx_emulate_io(vcpu);
>         case EXIT_REASON_EPT_VIOLATION:
>                 return tdx_emulate_mmio(vcpu);
> +       case EXIT_REASON_MSR_READ:
> +               return tdx_emulate_rdmsr(vcpu);
> +       case EXIT_REASON_MSR_WRITE:
> +               return tdx_emulate_wrmsr(vcpu);
>         default:
>                 break;
>         }
> --
> 2.25.1
>