linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/9] Replace PREEMPT_RT ifdefs with preempt_[dis|en]able

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHk-=wia=RhHOsbBpMT9qP2Vkig=P0=kAWnx6OoJuZjwck7kBw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 18 Aug 2022 10:41:21 -0700
From:   Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] Replace PREEMPT_RT ifdefs with preempt_[dis|en]able_nested().

On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 9:27 AM Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
<bigeasy@...utronix.de> wrote:
>
> This series introduces the macro and converts already existing users to
> that macro. The u64_stat interface was simplified to make the change
> simpler and code easier to follow.

Thanks. Apart from 1/9 where I had just that "this visually looks odd
and threw me" comment, this all looks like good nice cleanups to me.

             Linus