[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Yv6MB4bj9xpDtF+O@uudg.org>
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2022 15:59:19 -0300
From: "Luis Claudio R. Goncalves" <lgoncalv@...hat.com>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Cc: Yajun Deng <yajun.deng@...ux.dev>, peterz@...radead.org,
mingo@...hat.com, will@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10-rt] locking/rtmutex: switch to EXPORT_SYMBOL() for
ww_mutex_lock{,_interruptible}()
On Thu, Aug 18, 2022 at 06:32:37PM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On 2022-08-03 14:24:30 [+0800], Yajun Deng wrote:
> > We can use EXPORT_SYMBOL() instead of EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL() in
> > ww_mutex_lock_interruptible() and ww_mutex_lock(). That match
> > ww_mutex_unlock() well. And also good for 3rd kernel modules.
>
> Not that I am fan of this but it will sync the symbols with what landed
> upstream as of commit
> f8635d509d807 ("locking/ww_mutex: Implement rtmutex based ww_mutex API functions")
>
> therefore it would be good to have.
> Luis?
Looks good to me. I can add that to my next update.
Luis
> > Signed-off-by: Yajun Deng <yajun.deng@...ux.dev>
>
> Sebastian
>
---end quoted text---
Powered by blists - more mailing lists