[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Yv5ppS3wDbKFs9tv@linutronix.de>
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2022 18:32:37 +0200
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
To: Yajun Deng <yajun.deng@...ux.dev>,
"Luis Claudio R. Goncalves" <lgoncalv@...hat.com>
Cc: peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...hat.com, will@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10-rt] locking/rtmutex: switch to EXPORT_SYMBOL() for
ww_mutex_lock{,_interruptible}()
On 2022-08-03 14:24:30 [+0800], Yajun Deng wrote:
> We can use EXPORT_SYMBOL() instead of EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL() in
> ww_mutex_lock_interruptible() and ww_mutex_lock(). That match
> ww_mutex_unlock() well. And also good for 3rd kernel modules.
Not that I am fan of this but it will sync the symbols with what landed
upstream as of commit
f8635d509d807 ("locking/ww_mutex: Implement rtmutex based ww_mutex API functions")
therefore it would be good to have.
Luis?
> Signed-off-by: Yajun Deng <yajun.deng@...ux.dev>
Sebastian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists