[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Yv3kqoMo3R/7onlw@atomide.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2022 10:05:14 +0300
From: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
To: Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Daniel Scally <djrscally@...il.com>,
Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@...aro.org>,
Alexander Stein <alexander.stein@...tq-group.com>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
John Stultz <jstultz@...gle.com>,
Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>, kernel-team@...roid.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/9] fw_devlink improvements
Hi,
* Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com> [220815 18:16]:
> On Mon, Aug 15, 2022 at 3:33 AM Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com> wrote:
> >
> > * Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com> [220813 00:45]:
> > > On Fri, Aug 12, 2022 at 2:49 AM Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > * Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com> [220810 05:54]:
> > > > > Tony,
> > > > >
> > > > > This should handle the odd case of the child being the supplier of the
> > > > > parent. Can you please give this a shot? I want to make sure the cycle
> > > > > detection code handles this properly and treats it like it's NOT a cycle.
> > > >
> > > > Yup, this series works for me, so feel free to add:
> > > >
> > > > Tested-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
> > >
> > > Thanks for testing!
> > >
> > > Btw, out of curiosity, how many different boards did you test this on?
> > > IIRC you had an issue only in one board, right? Not to say I didn't
> > > break anything else, I'm just trying to see how much confidence we
> > > have on this series so far. I'm hoping the rest of the folks I listed
> > > in the email will get around to testing this series.
> >
> > Sorry if I was not clear earlier. The issue affects several generations
> > of TI 32-bit SoCs at least, not just one board.
>
> But this series fixes the issues for all of them or are you still
> seeing some broken boot with this series?
Yes. However, I'm now getting confused what exactly you're proposing to fix
the regressions for v6.0-rc series.
I'd like to see just the fixes series for v6.0-rc series. With proper fixes
tags, and possibly reverts.
Then discussing patches for Linux next can be done based on the fixes :)
Regards,
Tony
Powered by blists - more mailing lists