[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Yv4AoOupMrFJe5qZ@yadro.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2022 12:04:32 +0300
From: Konstantin Shelekhin <k.shelekhin@...ro.com>
To: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
CC: <ojeda@...nel.org>, <alex.gaynor@...il.com>,
<bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>, <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
<gary@...yguo.net>, <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
<jarkko@...nel.org>, <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <me@...enk.de>,
<milan@...verde.com>, <patches@...ts.linux.dev>,
<rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org>, <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
<wedsonaf@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 26/27] samples: add first Rust examples
On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 11:02:01PM +0200, Miguel Ojeda wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 6, 2022 at 3:15 PM Konstantin Shelekhin
> <k.shelekhin@...ro.com> wrote:
> >
> > I wonder if it would make more sense to implement exit() in
> > kernel::Module, just for the sake of uniformity.
>
> Do you mean uniformity with respect to the C side?
Yeah. It's weird that entry point is implemented in Module while exit
point in Drop.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists