[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220817234120.mw2j3cgshmuyo2vw@box.shutemov.name>
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2022 02:41:20 +0300
From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
Chao Peng <chao.p.peng@...ux.intel.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, qemu-devel@...gnu.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
x86@...nel.org, "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>,
"J . Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>,
Steven Price <steven.price@....com>,
"Maciej S . Szmigiero" <mail@...iej.szmigiero.name>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Vishal Annapurve <vannapurve@...gle.com>,
Yu Zhang <yu.c.zhang@...ux.intel.com>,
"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
luto@...nel.org, jun.nakajima@...el.com, dave.hansen@...el.com,
ak@...ux.intel.com, aarcange@...hat.com, ddutile@...hat.com,
dhildenb@...hat.com, Quentin Perret <qperret@...gle.com>,
Michael Roth <michael.roth@....com>, mhocko@...e.com,
Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 01/14] mm: Add F_SEAL_AUTO_ALLOCATE seal to memfd
On Fri, Aug 05, 2022 at 07:55:38PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 7/21/22 11:44, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> >
> > Also, I*think* you can place pages via userfaultfd into shmem. Not
> > sure if that would count "auto alloc", but it would certainly bypass
> > fallocate().
>
> Yeah, userfaultfd_register would probably have to forbid this for
> F_SEAL_AUTO_ALLOCATE vmas. Maybe the memfile_node can be reused for this,
> adding a new MEMFILE_F_NO_AUTO_ALLOCATE flags? Then userfault_register
> would do something like memfile_node_get_flags(vma->vm_file) and check the
> result.
I donno, memory allocation with userfaultfd looks pretty intentional to
me. Why would F_SEAL_AUTO_ALLOCATE prevent it?
Maybe we would need it in the future for post-copy migration or something?
Or existing practises around userfaultfd touch memory randomly and
therefore incompatible with F_SEAL_AUTO_ALLOCATE intent?
Note, that userfaultfd is only relevant for shared memory as it requires
VMA which we don't have for MFD_INACCESSIBLE.
--
Kiryl Shutsemau / Kirill A. Shutemov
Powered by blists - more mailing lists