| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <Yv2GN1WPvi7K8LdI@google.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2022 00:22:15 +0000
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
To: Peter Gonda <pgonda@...gle.com>
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
marcorr@...gle.com, michael.roth@....com, thomas.lendacky@....com,
joro@...tes.org, mizhang@...gle.com, pbonzini@...hat.com,
andrew.jones@...ux.dev, vannapurve@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [V3 11/11] KVM: selftests: Add simple sev vm testing
/sev_vm_launch_measurOn Wed, Aug 10, 2022, Peter Gonda wrote:
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86_64/sev.h b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86_64/sev.h
> index 2f7f7c741b12..b6552ea1c716 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86_64/sev.h
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86_64/sev.h
> @@ -22,6 +22,9 @@
> #define SEV_POLICY_NO_DBG (1UL << 0)
> #define SEV_POLICY_ES (1UL << 2)
>
> +#define CPUID_MEM_ENC_LEAF 0x8000001f
> +#define CPUID_EBX_CBIT_MASK 0x3f
Ha! I was going to say "put these in processor.h", but I have an even better idea.
I'll try to a series posted tomorrow (compile tested only at this point), but what
I'm hoping to do is to allow automagic retrieval of multi-bit CPUID properties, a la
the existing this_cpu_has() stuff.
E.g.
#define X86_PROPERTY_CBIT_LOCATION KVM_X86_CPU_PROPERTY(0x8000001F, 0, EBX, 0, 5)
and then
sev->enc_bit = this_cpu_property(X86_PROPERTY_CBIT_LOCATION);
LOL, now I see that the defines in sev.c were introduced back in patch 08. That's
probably fine for your submission so as not to take a dependency on the "property"
idea. This patch doesn't need to move the CPUID_* defines because it can use
this_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_SEV) and avoid referencing CPUID_MEM_ENC_LEAF.
> enum {
> SEV_GSTATE_UNINIT = 0,
> SEV_GSTATE_LUPDATE,
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86_64/sev.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86_64/sev.c
> index 3abcf50c0b5d..8f9f55c685a7 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86_64/sev.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86_64/sev.c
> @@ -13,8 +13,6 @@
> #include "sev.h"
>
> #define PAGE_SHIFT 12
Already defined in processor.h
> -#define CPUID_MEM_ENC_LEAF 0x8000001f
> -#define CPUID_EBX_CBIT_MASK 0x3f
>
> struct sev_vm {
> struct kvm_vm *vm;
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/sev_all_boot_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/sev_all_boot_test.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..b319d18bdb60
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/sev_all_boot_test.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,131 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
> +/*
> + * Basic SEV boot tests.
> + *
> + * Copyright (C) 2021 Advanced Micro Devices
> + */
> +#define _GNU_SOURCE /* for program_invocation_short_name */
> +#include <fcntl.h>
> +#include <stdio.h>
> +#include <stdlib.h>
> +#include <string.h>
> +#include <sys/ioctl.h>
> +
> +#include "test_util.h"
> +
> +#include "kvm_util.h"
> +#include "processor.h"
> +#include "svm_util.h"
> +#include "linux/psp-sev.h"
> +#include "sev.h"
> +
> +#define VCPU_ID 2
Nooooooo. Unless there is a really, REALLY good reason this needs to be '2', just
pass '0' as a literal to vm_vcpu_add() and delete VCPU_ID.
> +#define PAGE_STRIDE 32
> +
> +#define SHARED_PAGES 8192
> +#define SHARED_VADDR_MIN 0x1000000
> +
> +#define PRIVATE_PAGES 2048
> +#define PRIVATE_VADDR_MIN (SHARED_VADDR_MIN + SHARED_PAGES * PAGE_SIZE)
> +
> +#define TOTAL_PAGES (512 + SHARED_PAGES + PRIVATE_PAGES)
> +
> +#define NR_SYNCS 1
> +
> +static void guest_run_loop(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +{
> + struct ucall uc;
> + int i;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i <= NR_SYNCS; ++i) {
> + vcpu_run(vcpu);
> + switch (get_ucall(vcpu, &uc)) {
> + case UCALL_SYNC:
> + continue;
> + case UCALL_DONE:
> + return;
> + case UCALL_ABORT:
> + TEST_ASSERT(false, "%s at %s:%ld\n\tvalues: %#lx, %#lx",
> + (const char *)uc.args[0], __FILE__,
> + uc.args[1], uc.args[2], uc.args[3]);
> + default:
> + TEST_ASSERT(
> + false, "Unexpected exit: %s",
> + exit_reason_str(vcpu->run->exit_reason));
> + }
> + }
> +}
> +
> +static void __attribute__((__flatten__)) guest_sev_code(void)
Is __flatten__ strictly necessary? I don't see this being copied over anything
that would require it to be a contiguous chunk.
> +{
> + uint32_t eax, ebx, ecx, edx;
> + uint64_t sev_status;
> +
> + GUEST_SYNC(1);
> +
> + cpuid(CPUID_MEM_ENC_LEAF, &eax, &ebx, &ecx, &edx);
> + GUEST_ASSERT(eax & (1 << 1));
GUEST_ASSERT(this_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_SEV));
> +
> + sev_status = rdmsr(MSR_AMD64_SEV);
> + GUEST_ASSERT((sev_status & 0x1) == 1);
> +
> + GUEST_DONE();
> +}
> +
> +static struct sev_vm *setup_test_common(void *guest_code, uint64_t policy,
> + struct kvm_vcpu **vcpu)
> +{
> + uint8_t measurement[512];
> + struct sev_vm *sev;
> + struct kvm_vm *vm;
> + int i;
> +
> + sev = sev_vm_create(policy, TOTAL_PAGES);
TEST_ASSERT(sev, ...) so that this doesn't silently "pass"?
> + if (!sev)
> + return NULL;
> + vm = sev_get_vm(sev);
> +
> + /* Set up VCPU and initial guest kernel. */
> + *vcpu = vm_vcpu_add(vm, VCPU_ID, guest_code);
> + kvm_vm_elf_load(vm, program_invocation_name);
> +
> + /* Allocations/setup done. Encrypt initial guest payload. */
> + sev_vm_launch(sev);
> +
> + /* Dump the initial measurement. A test to actually verify it would be nice. */
> + sev_vm_launch_measure(sev, measurement);
> + pr_info("guest measurement: ");
> + for (i = 0; i < 32; ++i)
> + pr_info("%02x", measurement[i]);
> + pr_info("\n");
> +
> + sev_vm_launch_finish(sev);
> +
> + return sev;
> +}
> +
> +static void test_sev(void *guest_code, uint64_t policy)
> +{
> + struct sev_vm *sev;
> + struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
> +
> + sev = setup_test_common(guest_code, policy, &vcpu);
> + if (!sev)
> + return;
And with an assert above, this return goes away. Or better yet, fold setup_test_common()
into test_sev(), there's only the one user of the so called "common" function.
> +
> + /* Guest is ready to run. Do the tests. */
> + guest_run_loop(vcpu);
> +
> + pr_info("guest ran successfully\n");
> +
> + sev_vm_free(sev);
> +}
> +
> +int main(int argc, char *argv[])
> +{
> + /* SEV tests */
> + test_sev(guest_sev_code, SEV_POLICY_NO_DBG);
> + test_sev(guest_sev_code, 0);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> --
> 2.37.1.559.g78731f0fdb-goog
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists