[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <0F3FE8B0-9ADB-423D-A2FE-2AF1A3A6E619@linux.dev>
Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2022 14:56:56 +0800
From: Muchun Song <muchun.song@...ux.dev>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>, rafael@...nel.org,
Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Linux MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: hugetlb: simplify per-node sysfs creation and removal
> On Aug 19, 2022, at 14:44, Muchun Song <muchun.song@...ux.dev> wrote:
>
>
>
>> On Aug 19, 2022, at 14:32, Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2022 at 01:21:37PM +0800, Muchun Song wrote:
>>> The following commit offload per-node sysfs creation and removal to a kworker and
>>> did not say why it is needed. And it also said "I don't know that this is
>>> absolutely required". It seems like the author was not sure as well. Since it
>>> only complicates the code, this patch will revert the changes to simplify the code.
>>>
>>> 39da08cb074c ("hugetlb: offload per node attribute registrations")
>>
>> Any specific reason why you did not cc: the original author of this
>> commit, or anyone else on the patch?
>
> OK. Cc Lee Schermerhorn.
Unluckily, I guess the email address is out of date since I just got bounced mail
(Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender). Remove lee.schermerhorn@...com from the
Cc list.
>
>>
>>> We could use memory hotplug notifier to do per-node sysfs creation and removal
>>> instead of inserting those operations to node registration and unregistration.
>>> Then, it can reduce the code coupling between node.c and hugetlb.c. Also, it can
>>> simplify the code.
>>
>> I do not think we had memory hotplug notifier back in 2009 when this
>> commit was first written.
>
> Maybe not. Commit 39da08cb074c is merger in 2009. However, hotplug notifier mechanism
> is merged in 2006. The document is updated in 2007 (see commit 10020ca246c5).
>
>>
>> How did you test this? Did you use a HUGETLBFS system and verify that
>> everything still works properly? You are deleting a lot of code (always
>> nice), but making sure everything is still operating the same is a good
>> thing.
>
> I really did the test (through a VM), it works properly.
>
> Thanks.
>
>>
>> thanks,
>>
>> greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists