lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 19 Aug 2022 04:28:32 -0700
From:   Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To:     Isaac Manjarres <isaacmanjarres@...gle.com>
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
        Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
        Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@...labora.com>,
        Russell King <rmk+kernel@....linux.org.uk>,
        Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
        Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>, stable@...nel.org,
        kernel-team@...roid.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] driver core: Fix bus_type.match() error handling

On Thu, Aug 18, 2022 at 05:38:15PM -0700, Isaac Manjarres wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 18, 2022 at 03:59:32PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > Requesting system reboot
> > sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Synchronizing SCSI cache
> > ci_hdrc ci_hdrc.1: remove, state 4
> > usb usb2: USB disconnect, device number 1
> > ci_hdrc ci_hdrc.1: USB bus 2 deregistered
> > ci_hdrc ci_hdrc.0: remove, state 1
> > usb usb1: USB disconnect, device number 1
> > usb 1-1: USB disconnect, device number 2
> > sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Synchronizing SCSI cache
> > sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Synchronize Cache(10) failed: Result: hostbyte=0x01 driverbyte=DRIVER_OK
> > 
> > [ stuck here until qemu is killed ]
> > 
> Hi Guenter,
> 
> I'm actually observing the behavior described above even without my patch.
> The tip of my tree is currently at 573ae4f13f63 ("tee: add overflow check in
> register_shm_helper()"). I used git bisect to find what commit was
> causing the problem, and narrowed it down to this series[1].
> 
> I reverted all 4 patches in that series, and I no longer see this hang
> with my tree.
> 
> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220712221936.1199196-1-bvanassche@acm.org/
> 
> Are these patches part of the tree you're using for testing and
> observing this hang in?
> 

Yes, you are correct. I also see the problem in the mainline kernel,
at SHA 3b06a2755758, and with a large number of boots from usb drive
in various arm emulations. Sorry for the confusion. Too many crashes :-(.

Guenter

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ