[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdUSud4-0ercQe3cyg1RXqg4DKTfgvPh5wc8ibca6dyDKQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2022 14:07:28 +0200
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To: Conor Dooley <Conor.Dooley@...rochip.com>
Cc: "Lad, Prabhakar" <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
Anup Patel <anup@...infault.org>,
Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-riscv <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Prabhakar Lad <prabhakar.csengg@...il.com>,
Biju Das <biju.das.jz@...renesas.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/8] riscv: dts: renesas: Add initial devicetree for
Renesas RZ/Five SoC
Hi Conor,
On Sat, Aug 20, 2022 at 10:49 AM <Conor.Dooley@...rochip.com> wrote:
> On 20/08/2022 09:45, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 19, 2022 at 8:40 PM <Conor.Dooley@...rochip.com> wrote:
> >> On 15/08/2022 16:14, Lad Prabhakar wrote:
> >>> Add initial device tree for Renesas RZ/Five RISC-V CPU Core (AX45MP
> >>> Single).
> >>>
> >>> Below is the list of IP blocks added in the initial SoC DTSI which can be
> >>> used to boot via initramfs on RZ/Five SMARC EVK:
> >>> - AX45MP CPU
> >>> - CPG
> >>> - PINCTRL
> >>> - PLIC
> >>> - SCIF0
> >>> - SYSC
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>
> >> That aside, by convention so far we have put things like extals or
> >> reference clocks below the /cpus node. Could you do the same here too
> >> please?
> >
> > Really? We've been putting them at the root node for a long time,
> > since the separate "clocks" grouping subnode was deprecated.
> > The extal-clk is not even part of the SoC, so it should definitely
> > not be under the /cpus node.
>
> Under may have been a confusing choice of words, I meant "physically"
> under it in the file. Maybe after would have been a better choice of
> words? I wasn't suggesting you put it inside the CPUs node.
> Does that make more sense?
Oh right, you mean the order of the nodes. Yes, "extal-clk" should
be after "cpus", following alphabetical sort order, as the nodes have no
unit addresses.
Sorry for missing that in my review. I also misread "below"
(in Dutch there is only a single word for "below" and "under" ;-)
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
Powered by blists - more mailing lists