[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YwHWfa/97BJ5EAbe@infradead.org>
Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2022 23:53:49 -0700
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, hch@...radead.org,
agordeev@...ux.ibm.com, wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/11] mm/ioremap: change the return value of
io[re|un]map_allowed and rename
On Sat, Aug 20, 2022 at 08:31:15AM +0800, Baoquan He wrote:
> +void __iomem *arch_ioremap(phys_addr_t phys_addr, size_t size, unsigned long prot);
Please avoid the overly long lines.
I also wonder if we just want a common definition with a __weak default
instead of duplicating it in many arch headers.
> + ioaddr = arch_ioremap(phys_addr, size, prot);
> + if (IS_ERR(ioaddr))
> + return NULL;
> + else if (ioaddr)
> + return ioaddr;
No need for the else here.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists