linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 03/11] mm: ioremap: allow ARCH to have its own ioremap definition

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YwHXWdycBZr+bluG@infradead.org>
Date:   Sat, 20 Aug 2022 23:57:29 -0700
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To:     Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, hch@...radead.org,
        agordeev@...ux.ibm.com, wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 03/11] mm: ioremap: allow ARCH to have its own ioremap
 definition

On Sat, Aug 20, 2022 at 08:31:17AM +0800, Baoquan He wrote:
> Architectures like xtensa, arc, can be converted to GENERIC_IOREMAP,
> to take standard ioremap_prot() and ioremap_xxx() way. But they have
> ARCH specific handling for ioremap() method, than standard ioremap()
> method.

Do they?

For arc, the arc_uncached_addr_space case can be easily handled by
arch_ioremap, and the xtensa case looks very similar to that.

I'd really like to kill off arch definitions of ioremap going
forward, as they should just be a special case of ioremap_prot
by definition.