lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 22 Aug 2022 11:11:06 +0200
From:   Thorsten Leemhuis <regressions@...mhuis.info>
To:     Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>, lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:     Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>,
        Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>, Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>,
        John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>, ericspero@...oud.com,
        jason600.groome@...il.com,
        "regressions@...ts.linux.dev" <regressions@...ts.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: regression bisect --> 88f1669019bd " scsi: sd: Rework
 asynchronous resume support"

Hi, this is your Linux kernel regression tracker.

On 21.08.22 09:34, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> Greetings,
> 
> My box claims this patch is a dud for it, symptom being hang during
> suspend _after_ a successful suspend/resume cycle. Revert at bisect
> starting point and now HEAD (15b3f48a4339) confirms box's assertion.
> [...]
> # first bad commit: [88f1669019bd62b3009a3cebf772fbaaa21b9f38] scsi: sd: Rework asynchronous resume support

FYI, in case you missed it: there are multiple reports that this patch
is causing problems. A revert and a partial reverts are discussed:

https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220816172638.538734-1-bvanassche@acm.org/
https://lore.kernel.org/regressions/dd6844e7-f338-a4e9-2dad-0960e25b2ca1@redhat.com/
https://lore.kernel.org/all/98592410-dd31-9081-86be-fda67d3b06d2@suse.cz/

See also:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/ecf878dc-905b-f714-4c44-6c90e81f8391@acm.org/

Ciao, Thorsten (wearing his 'the Linux kernel's regression tracker' hat)

P.S.: As the Linux kernel's regression tracker I deal with a lot of
reports and sometimes miss something important when writing mails like
this. If that's the case here, don't hesitate to tell me in a public
reply, it's in everyone's interest to set the public record straight.

P.P.S.: Just to be sure, add this report to the regression tracking, too:

#regzbot ^introduced: 88f1669019bd62b3009a3
#regzbot dup-of:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/98592410-dd31-9081-86be-fda67d3b06d2@suse.cz/
#regzbot monitor:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-scsi/20220821220502.13685-1-bvanassche@acm.org/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ