[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <dbde377fbefdf77323e00c6aeeac251273a8a36c.camel@gmx.de>
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2022 11:51:54 +0200
From: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
To: Thorsten Leemhuis <regressions@...mhuis.info>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>,
Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>, Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>,
John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>, ericspero@...oud.com,
jason600.groome@...il.com,
"regressions@...ts.linux.dev" <regressions@...ts.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: regression bisect --> 88f1669019bd " scsi: sd: Rework
asynchronous resume support"
On Mon, 2022-08-22 at 11:11 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> Hi, this is your Linux kernel regression tracker.
>
> On 21.08.22 09:34, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > Greetings,
> >
> > My box claims this patch is a dud for it, symptom being hang during
> > suspend _after_ a successful suspend/resume cycle. Revert at bisect
> > starting point and now HEAD (15b3f48a4339) confirms box's assertion.
> > [...]
> > # first bad commit: [88f1669019bd62b3009a3cebf772fbaaa21b9f38] scsi: sd: Rework asynchronous resume support
>
> FYI, in case you missed it: there are multiple reports that this patch
> is causing problems. A revert and a partial reverts are discussed:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220816172638.538734-1-bvanassche@acm.org/
> https://lore.kernel.org/regressions/dd6844e7-f338-a4e9-2dad-0960e25b2ca1@redhat.com/
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/98592410-dd31-9081-86be-fda67d3b06d2@suse.cz/
>
> See also:
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/ecf878dc-905b-f714-4c44-6c90e81f8391@acm.org/
Yup, missed all that. Hohum, tosses bisection on the 'dead bugs' pile.
-Mike
Powered by blists - more mailing lists