[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220822114701.26975-2-xiujianfeng@huawei.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2022 19:46:57 +0800
From: Xiu Jianfeng <xiujianfeng@...wei.com>
To: <mic@...ikod.net>, <paul@...l-moore.com>, <jmorris@...ei.org>,
<serge@...lyn.com>, <shuah@...nel.org>, <corbet@....net>
CC: <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH -next 1/5] landlock: expand access_mask_t to u32 type
u16 is not enough to add more types of restritions, so expand it to u32
Signed-off-by: Xiu Jianfeng <xiujianfeng@...wei.com>
---
security/landlock/ruleset.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/security/landlock/ruleset.h b/security/landlock/ruleset.h
index d43231b783e4..607b3dc0ef19 100644
--- a/security/landlock/ruleset.h
+++ b/security/landlock/ruleset.h
@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@
#include "limits.h"
#include "object.h"
-typedef u16 access_mask_t;
+typedef u32 access_mask_t;
/* Makes sure all filesystem access rights can be stored. */
static_assert(BITS_PER_TYPE(access_mask_t) >= LANDLOCK_NUM_ACCESS_FS);
/* Makes sure for_each_set_bit() and for_each_clear_bit() calls are OK. */
--
2.17.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists