[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220823142456.3977086-3-joefradley@google.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2022 07:24:55 -0700
From: Joe Fradley <joefradley@...gle.com>
To: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Brendan Higgins <brendan.higgins@...ux.dev>,
David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>
Cc: Joe Fradley <joefradley@...gle.com>, kernel-team@...roid.com,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, kunit-dev@...glegroups.com,
Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/2] kunit: no longer call module_info(test, "Y") for kunit modules
Because KUnit test execution is not a guarantee with the kunit.enable
parameter we want to be careful to only taint the kernel when actual
tests run. Calling module_info(test, "Y") for every KUnit module
automatically causes the kernel to be tainted upon module load. Therefore,
we're removing this call and relying on the KUnit framework to taint the
kernel or not.
Signed-off-by: Joe Fradley <joefradley@...gle.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>
---
Changes since v1:
- Added David's and Brendan's Reviewed-by for tags.
include/kunit/test.h | 1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/include/kunit/test.h b/include/kunit/test.h
index ee6bf4ecbd89..512089e5ce4e 100644
--- a/include/kunit/test.h
+++ b/include/kunit/test.h
@@ -253,7 +253,6 @@ static inline int kunit_run_all_tests(void)
#endif /* IS_BUILTIN(CONFIG_KUNIT) */
#define __kunit_test_suites(unique_array, ...) \
- MODULE_INFO(test, "Y"); \
static struct kunit_suite *unique_array[] \
__aligned(sizeof(struct kunit_suite *)) \
__used __section(".kunit_test_suites") = { __VA_ARGS__ }
--
2.37.1.595.g718a3a8f04-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists