lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2022 17:04:36 +0200 From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz> To: Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@...il.com>, Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>, Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>, David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>, Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev> Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 13/17] mm/sl[au]b: cleanup kmem_cache_alloc[_node]_trace() On 8/17/22 12:18, Hyeonggon Yoo wrote: > This patch does: I've removed this line locally and re-idented the rest. > - Despite its name, kmem_cache_alloc[_node]_trace() is hook for > inlined kmalloc. So rename it to kmalloc[_node]_trace(). > > - Move its implementation to slab_common.c by using > __kmem_cache_alloc_node(), but keep CONFIG_TRACING=n varients to > save a function call when CONFIG_TRACING=n. > > - Use __assume_kmalloc_alignment for kmalloc[_node]_trace > instead of __assume_slab_alignement. Generally kmalloc has > larger alignment requirements. > > Suggested-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz> > Signed-off-by: Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@...il.com> Reviewed-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists