[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <df514b30-3a9a-679e-1851-7589526960a1@suse.cz>
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2022 17:04:36 +0200
From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
To: Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@...il.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 13/17] mm/sl[au]b: cleanup
kmem_cache_alloc[_node]_trace()
On 8/17/22 12:18, Hyeonggon Yoo wrote:
> This patch does:
I've removed this line locally and re-idented the rest.
> - Despite its name, kmem_cache_alloc[_node]_trace() is hook for
> inlined kmalloc. So rename it to kmalloc[_node]_trace().
>
> - Move its implementation to slab_common.c by using
> __kmem_cache_alloc_node(), but keep CONFIG_TRACING=n varients to
> save a function call when CONFIG_TRACING=n.
>
> - Use __assume_kmalloc_alignment for kmalloc[_node]_trace
> instead of __assume_slab_alignement. Generally kmalloc has
> larger alignment requirements.
>
> Suggested-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
> Signed-off-by: Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@...il.com>
Reviewed-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists