[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4abccfc9-fbaf-8683-5641-f4b767f3f913@arm.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2022 10:04:34 -0500
From: Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@....com>
To: Riwen Lu <luriwen@...mail.com>, rafael@...nel.org,
rui.zhang@...el.com, lenb@...nel.org
Cc: linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Riwen Lu <luriwen@...inos.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] ACPI: processor: Remove freq Qos request for all CPUs
Hi,
On 8/23/22 02:43, Riwen Lu wrote:
> From: Riwen Lu <luriwen@...inos.cn>
>
> The freq Qos request would be removed repeatedly if the cpufreq policy
> relates to more than one CPU. Then, it would cause the "called for unknown
> object" warning.
>
> Remove the freq Qos request for each CPU relates to the cpufreq policy,
> instead of removing repeatedly for the last CPU of it.
>
> Fixes: a1bb46c36ce3 ("ACPI: processor: Add QoS requests for all CPUs")
> Reported-by: Jeremy Linton <Jeremy.Linton@....com>
> Signed-off-by: Riwen Lu <luriwen@...inos.cn>
> ---
> drivers/acpi/processor_thermal.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/processor_thermal.c b/drivers/acpi/processor_thermal.c
> index db6ac540e924..e534fd49a67e 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/processor_thermal.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/processor_thermal.c
> @@ -151,7 +151,7 @@ void acpi_thermal_cpufreq_exit(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
> unsigned int cpu;
>
> for_each_cpu(cpu, policy->related_cpus) {
> - struct acpi_processor *pr = per_cpu(processors, policy->cpu);
> + struct acpi_processor *pr = per_cpu(processors, cpu);
>
> if (pr)
> freq_qos_remove_request(&pr->thermal_req);
This appears to have fixed the module unloading problem. I haven't seen
any newer issues either so:
Tested-by: Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@....com>
Thanks,
Powered by blists - more mailing lists