| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2022 08:45:32 -0700
From: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.com>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Will Drewry <wad@...omium.org>
CC: Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>,
Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.com>,
Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuni1840@...il.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<syzbot+ab17848fe269b573eb71@...kaller.appspotmail.com>,
Ayushman Dutta <ayudutta@...zon.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3] seccomp: Move copy_seccomp() to no failure path.
Our syzbot instance reported memory leaks in do_seccomp() [0], similar
to the report [1]. It shows that we miss freeing struct seccomp_filter
and some objects included in it.
We can reproduce the issue with the program below [2] which calls one
seccomp() and two clone() syscalls.
The first clone()d child exits earlier than its parent and sends a
signal to kill it during the second clone(), more precisely before the
fatal_signal_pending() test in copy_process(). When the parent receives
the signal, it has to destroy the embryonic process and return -EINTR to
user space. In the failure path, we have to call seccomp_filter_release()
to decrement the filter's refcount.
Initially, we called it in free_task() called from the failure path, but
the commit 3a15fb6ed92c ("seccomp: release filter after task is fully
dead") moved it to release_task() to notify user space as early as possible
that the filter is no longer used.
To keep the change and current seccomp refcount semantics, let's move
copy_seccomp() just after the signal check and add a WARN_ON_ONCE() in
free_task() for future debugging.
[0]:
unreferenced object 0xffff8880063add00 (size 256):
comm "repro_seccomp", pid 230, jiffies 4294687090 (age 9.914s)
hex dump (first 32 bytes):
01 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ................
backtrace:
do_seccomp (./include/linux/slab.h:600 ./include/linux/slab.h:733 kernel/seccomp.c:666 kernel/seccomp.c:708 kernel/seccomp.c:1871 kernel/seccomp.c:1991)
do_syscall_64 (arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80)
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe (arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:120)
unreferenced object 0xffffc90000035000 (size 4096):
comm "repro_seccomp", pid 230, jiffies 4294687090 (age 9.915s)
hex dump (first 32 bytes):
01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 05 00 00 00 ................
00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
backtrace:
__vmalloc_node_range (mm/vmalloc.c:3226)
__vmalloc_node (mm/vmalloc.c:3261 (discriminator 4))
bpf_prog_alloc_no_stats (kernel/bpf/core.c:91)
bpf_prog_alloc (kernel/bpf/core.c:129)
bpf_prog_create_from_user (net/core/filter.c:1414)
do_seccomp (kernel/seccomp.c:671 kernel/seccomp.c:708 kernel/seccomp.c:1871 kernel/seccomp.c:1991)
do_syscall_64 (arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80)
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe (arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:120)
unreferenced object 0xffff888003fa1000 (size 1024):
comm "repro_seccomp", pid 230, jiffies 4294687090 (age 9.915s)
hex dump (first 32 bytes):
00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
backtrace:
bpf_prog_alloc_no_stats (./include/linux/slab.h:600 ./include/linux/slab.h:733 kernel/bpf/core.c:95)
bpf_prog_alloc (kernel/bpf/core.c:129)
bpf_prog_create_from_user (net/core/filter.c:1414)
do_seccomp (kernel/seccomp.c:671 kernel/seccomp.c:708 kernel/seccomp.c:1871 kernel/seccomp.c:1991)
do_syscall_64 (arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80)
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe (arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:120)
unreferenced object 0xffff888006360240 (size 16):
comm "repro_seccomp", pid 230, jiffies 4294687090 (age 9.915s)
hex dump (first 16 bytes):
01 00 37 00 76 65 72 6c e0 83 01 06 80 88 ff ff ..7.verl........
backtrace:
bpf_prog_store_orig_filter (net/core/filter.c:1137)
bpf_prog_create_from_user (net/core/filter.c:1428)
do_seccomp (kernel/seccomp.c:671 kernel/seccomp.c:708 kernel/seccomp.c:1871 kernel/seccomp.c:1991)
do_syscall_64 (arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80)
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe (arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:120)
unreferenced object 0xffff8880060183e0 (size 8):
comm "repro_seccomp", pid 230, jiffies 4294687090 (age 9.915s)
hex dump (first 8 bytes):
06 00 00 00 00 00 ff 7f ........
backtrace:
kmemdup (mm/util.c:129)
bpf_prog_store_orig_filter (net/core/filter.c:1144)
bpf_prog_create_from_user (net/core/filter.c:1428)
do_seccomp (kernel/seccomp.c:671 kernel/seccomp.c:708 kernel/seccomp.c:1871 kernel/seccomp.c:1991)
do_syscall_64 (arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80)
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe (arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:120)
[1]: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=2809bb0ac77ad9aa3f4afe42d6a610aba594a987
[2]:
#define _GNU_SOURCE
#include <sched.h>
#include <signal.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <sys/syscall.h>
#include <linux/filter.h>
#include <linux/seccomp.h>
void main(void)
{
struct sock_filter filter[] = {
BPF_STMT(BPF_RET | BPF_K, SECCOMP_RET_ALLOW),
};
struct sock_fprog fprog = {
.len = sizeof(filter) / sizeof(filter[0]),
.filter = filter,
};
long i, pid;
syscall(__NR_seccomp, SECCOMP_SET_MODE_FILTER, 0, &fprog);
for (i = 0; i < 2; i++) {
pid = syscall(__NR_clone, CLONE_NEWNET | SIGKILL, NULL, NULL, 0);
if (pid == 0)
return;
}
}
Fixes: 3a15fb6ed92c ("seccomp: release filter after task is fully dead")
Reported-by: syzbot+ab17848fe269b573eb71@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Reported-by: Ayushman Dutta <ayudutta@...zon.com>
Suggested-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Signed-off-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian Brauner (Microsoft) <brauner@...nel.org>
---
v3:
* Fix build failure for CONFIG_SECCOMP=n case
v2: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220823004806.38681-1-kuniyu@amazon.com/
* Move copy_seccomp() after no failure path instead of adding
seccomp_filter_release() in the failure path.
v1: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220822204436.26631-1-kuniyu@amazon.com/
---
kernel/fork.c | 17 +++++++++++------
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/fork.c b/kernel/fork.c
index 90c85b17bf69..6ac1cc62f197 100644
--- a/kernel/fork.c
+++ b/kernel/fork.c
@@ -537,6 +537,9 @@ void put_task_stack(struct task_struct *tsk)
void free_task(struct task_struct *tsk)
{
+#ifdef CONFIG_SECCOMP
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(tsk->seccomp.filter);
+#endif
release_user_cpus_ptr(tsk);
scs_release(tsk);
@@ -2409,12 +2412,6 @@ static __latent_entropy struct task_struct *copy_process(
spin_lock(¤t->sighand->siglock);
- /*
- * Copy seccomp details explicitly here, in case they were changed
- * before holding sighand lock.
- */
- copy_seccomp(p);
-
rv_task_fork(p);
rseq_fork(p, clone_flags);
@@ -2431,6 +2428,14 @@ static __latent_entropy struct task_struct *copy_process(
goto bad_fork_cancel_cgroup;
}
+ /* No more failure paths after this point. */
+
+ /*
+ * Copy seccomp details explicitly here, in case they were changed
+ * before holding sighand lock.
+ */
+ copy_seccomp(p);
+
init_task_pid_links(p);
if (likely(p->pid)) {
ptrace_init_task(p, (clone_flags & CLONE_PTRACE) || trace);
--
2.30.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists