[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YwT3V6A4xrS3jAqf@lunn.ch>
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2022 17:50:47 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Suman Ghosh <sumang@...vell.com>
Cc: sgoutham@...vell.com, lcherian@...vell.com, gakula@...vell.com,
jerinj@...vell.com, hkelam@...vell.com, sbhatta@...vell.com,
davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org,
pabeni@...hat.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] octeontx2-pf: Add egress PFC support
> -int otx2_txschq_config(struct otx2_nic *pfvf, int lvl)
> +int otx2_txschq_config(struct otx2_nic *pfvf, int lvl, int prio, bool txschq_for_pfc)
> {
> struct otx2_hw *hw = &pfvf->hw;
> struct nix_txschq_config *req;
> @@ -602,7 +602,13 @@ int otx2_txschq_config(struct otx2_nic *pfvf, int lvl)
> req->lvl = lvl;
> req->num_regs = 1;
>
> - schq = hw->txschq_list[lvl][0];
> +#ifdef CONFIG_DCB
> + if (txschq_for_pfc)
> + schq = pfvf->pfc_schq_list[lvl][prio];
> + else
> +#endif
Please could you try to remove as many of these #ifdef CONFIG_DCB as
possible. It makes build testing less efficient at finding build
problems. Can you do:
> + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DCB) && txschq_for_pfc)
> + schq = pfvf->pfc_schq_list[lvl][prio];
> +#ifdef CONFIG_DCB
> +int otx2_pfc_txschq_config(struct otx2_nic *pfvf)
> +{
> + u8 pfc_en, pfc_bit_set;
> + int prio, lvl, err;
> +
> + pfc_en = pfvf->pfc_en;
> + for (prio = 0; prio < NIX_PF_PFC_PRIO_MAX; prio++) {
> + pfc_bit_set = pfc_en & (1 << prio);
> +
Maybe put all of this into a file of its own, and provide stubs for
when it is not enabled?
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists