linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5.19 000/362] 5.19.4-rc2 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YwaUoTo4oc+NziAA@debian>
Date:   Wed, 24 Aug 2022 22:14:09 +0100
From:   "Sudip Mukherjee (Codethink)" <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
        torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org,
        lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de, jonathanh@...dia.com,
        f.fainelli@...il.com, slade@...dewatkins.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.19 000/362] 5.19.4-rc2 review

Hi Greg,

On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 09:01:14AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.19.4 release.
> There are 362 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Fri, 26 Aug 2022 06:58:34 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.

Build test (gcc version 12.2.1 20220819):
mips: 59 configs -> 1 failure
arm: 99 configs -> no failure
arm64: 3 configs -> no failure
x86_64: 4 configs -> no failure
alpha allmodconfig -> no failure
csky allmodconfig -> fails
powerpc allmodconfig -> no failure
riscv allmodconfig -> no failure
s390 allmodconfig -> no failure
xtensa allmodconfig -> no failure

Note:
csky and mips allmodconfig fails with gcc-12, passes with gcc-11.
Already reported for mainline.

Boot test:
x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression.
x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1]
arm64: Booted on rpi4b (4GB model). No regression. [2]
Note: drm warning on rpi4b, already reported for mainline.
mips: Booted on ci20 board. No regression. [3]

[1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/1697
[2]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/1701
[3]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/1703

Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip.mukherjee@...ethink.co.uk>

-- 
Regards
Sudip