linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RFC char-misc-next 1/5] misc: microchip: pci1xxxx: load auxiliary bus driver for the PIO function in the multi-function endpoint of pci1xxxx device.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ade486645b0e800afb5478a3e5b4bf853a65cc6a.camel@microchip.com>
Date:   Wed, 24 Aug 2022 10:03:17 +0000
From:   <Kumaravel.Thiagarajan@...rochip.com>
To:     <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
CC:     <dragan.cvetic@...inx.com>, <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com>,
        <arnd@...db.de>, <derek.kiernan@...inx.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC char-misc-next 1/5] misc: microchip: pci1xxxx: load
 auxiliary bus driver for the PIO function in the multi-function endpoint of
 pci1xxxx device.

On Tue, 2022-08-23 at 13:24 +0200, Greg KH wrote:
> 
> On Thu, Aug 04, 2022 at 10:02:15PM +0530, Kumaravel Thiagarajan wrote:
> > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+
> 
> I have to ask, do you really mean "or any later version" like you are
> saying here?

It has to be GPL-2.0 and I will modify that.

> 
> > +// Copyright (C) 2022 Microchip Technology Inc.
> > +
> > +#include <linux/mfd/core.h>
> > +#include <linux/module.h>
> > +#include <linux/pci.h>
> > +#include <linux/spinlock.h>
> > +#include <linux/gpio/driver.h>
> > +#include <linux/interrupt.h>
> > +#include <linux/io.h>
> > +#include <linux/idr.h>
> > +#include "mchp_pci1xxxx_gp.h"
> > +
> > +struct aux_bus_device {
> > +     struct auxiliary_device_wrapper *aux_device_wrapper[2];
> > +};
> > +
> > +DEFINE_IDA(gp_client_ida);
> 
> Shouldn't this be static?

Yes. I will make the correction.

Thank You.

Regards,
Kumar