linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] x86/sgx: Allow exposing EDECCSSA user leaf function to KVM guest

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YweaEl48I7pxKMm8@google.com>
Date:   Thu, 25 Aug 2022 15:49:38 +0000
From:   Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
To:     Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
Cc:     Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>,
        Kai Huang <kai.huang@...el.com>, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com,
        linux-sgx@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, pbonzini@...hat.com,
        haitao.huang@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] x86/sgx: Allow exposing EDECCSSA user leaf function
 to KVM guest

On Thu, Aug 25, 2022, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On 8/25/22 08:19, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> >>> This patch, along with your patch to expose AEX-notify attribute bit to
> >>> guest, have been tested that both AEX-notify and EDECCSSA work in the VM.
> >>> Feel free to merge this patch.
> > Dave, any objection to taking this through the KVM tree?
> 
> This specific patch?  Or are you talking about the couple of AEX-notify
> patches in their entirety?

I was thinking just this specific patch, but I temporarily forgot there are more
patches in flight.  It would be a bit odd to have effectively half of the AEX-notify
enabling go through KVM.

So with shortlog/changelog tweaks,

Acked-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>