[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YwfNKePFxyeRtscl@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2022 22:27:37 +0300
From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Kai Huang <kai.huang@...el.com>, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com,
linux-sgx@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, pbonzini@...hat.com,
haitao.huang@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] x86/sgx: Allow exposing EDECCSSA user leaf function
to KVM guest
On Thu, Aug 25, 2022 at 03:49:38PM +0000, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 25, 2022, Dave Hansen wrote:
> > On 8/25/22 08:19, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > >>> This patch, along with your patch to expose AEX-notify attribute bit to
> > >>> guest, have been tested that both AEX-notify and EDECCSSA work in the VM.
> > >>> Feel free to merge this patch.
> > > Dave, any objection to taking this through the KVM tree?
> >
> > This specific patch? Or are you talking about the couple of AEX-notify
> > patches in their entirety?
>
> I was thinking just this specific patch, but I temporarily forgot there are more
> patches in flight. It would be a bit odd to have effectively half of the AEX-notify
> enabling go through KVM.
>
> So with shortlog/changelog tweaks,
>
> Acked-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
with subsystem tag change (Sean's version):
Acked-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>
BR, Jarkko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists