[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6ae8a6ede768315c43f3dd224d339c4c41c3e445.camel@intel.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2022 01:37:13 +0000
From: "Huang, Kai" <kai.huang@...el.com>
To: "jarkko@...nel.org" <jarkko@...nel.org>,
"Christopherson,, Sean" <seanjc@...gle.com>
CC: "linux-sgx@...r.kernel.org" <linux-sgx@...r.kernel.org>,
"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
"pbonzini@...hat.com" <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
"Hansen, Dave" <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"haitao.huang@...ux.intel.com" <haitao.huang@...ux.intel.com>,
"dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com" <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] x86/sgx: Allow exposing EDECCSSA user leaf function to
KVM guest
On Thu, 2022-08-25 at 22:27 +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 25, 2022 at 03:49:38PM +0000, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 25, 2022, Dave Hansen wrote:
> > > On 8/25/22 08:19, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > > > > > This patch, along with your patch to expose AEX-notify attribute bit to
> > > > > > guest, have been tested that both AEX-notify and EDECCSSA work in the VM.
> > > > > > Feel free to merge this patch.
> > > > Dave, any objection to taking this through the KVM tree?
> > >
> > > This specific patch? Or are you talking about the couple of AEX-notify
> > > patches in their entirety?
> >
> > I was thinking just this specific patch, but I temporarily forgot there are more
> > patches in flight. It would be a bit odd to have effectively half of the AEX-notify
> > enabling go through KVM.
> >
> > So with shortlog/changelog tweaks,
> >
> > Acked-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
>
> with subsystem tag change (Sean's version):
>
> Acked-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>
>
> BR, Jarkko
Thanks. Will send out a new version with updated title and changelog.
--
Thanks,
-Kai
Powered by blists - more mailing lists