[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <923f4d1b576295ea738df052543e4ca0be2ea616.camel@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2022 21:27:24 +0200
From: Janis Schoetterl-Glausch <scgl@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com>,
Janosch Frank <frankja@...ux.ibm.com>,
Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@...ux.ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>,
kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>,
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
Sven Schnelle <svens@...ux.ibm.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: s390: Pass initialized arg even if unused
On Thu, 2022-08-25 at 10:30 +0200, Heiko Carstens wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 05:30:11PM +0200, Janis Schoetterl-Glausch wrote:
> > This silences smatch warnings reported by kbuild bot:
> > arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.c:859 guest_range_to_gpas() error: uninitialized symbol 'prot'.
> > arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.c:1064 access_guest_with_key() error: uninitialized symbol 'prot'.
> >
> > This is because it cannot tell that the value is not used in this case.
> > The trans_exc* only examine prot if code is PGM_PROTECTION.
> > Pass a dummy value for other codes.
> >
> > Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
> > Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Janis Schoetterl-Glausch <scgl@...ux.ibm.com>
> > ---
> > arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.c | 15 ++++++++++++---
> > 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
[...]
> > gpa = kvm_s390_real_to_abs(vcpu, ga);
> > - if (kvm_is_error_gpa(vcpu->kvm, gpa))
> > + if (kvm_is_error_gpa(vcpu->kvm, gpa)) {
> > rc = PGM_ADDRESSING;
> > + prot = PROT_NONE;
> > + }
> ...
> > + if (rc == PGM_PROTECTION)
> > + prot = PROT_TYPE_KEYC;
> > + else
> > + prot = PROT_NONE;
>
> For both cases I would suggest to preinitialize prot with PROT_NONE in
> order to keep the code smaller - but not my call.
I chose this to make it really obvious that PROT_NONE is used only in
cases where code != PGM_PROTECTION.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists