[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8dd88179-66e5-2f08-4cb9-6677b154a2d7@linaro.org>
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2022 20:41:05 +0300
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Michael Walle <michael@...le.cc>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Lars Povlsen <lars.povlsen@...rochip.com>,
Steen Hegelund <Steen.Hegelund@...rochip.com>,
Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@...rochip.com>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>
Cc: UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] dt-bindings: net: sparx5: don't require a reset line
On 26/08/2022 14:56, Michael Walle wrote:
> Make the reset line optional. It turns out, there is no dedicated reset
> for the switch. Instead, the reset which was used up until now, was kind
> of a global reset. This is now handled elsewhere, thus don't require a
> reset.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michael Walle <michael@...le.cc>
> ---
Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists