[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220826124603.4a28a154@endymion.delvare>
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2022 12:46:03 +0200
From: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.de>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Cc: linux-iio <linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iio:accel:dmard06: Optimize when CONFIG_OF isn't set
Hi Andy,
On Thu, 25 Aug 2022 23:12:43 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 25, 2022 at 3:54 PM Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.de> wrote:
> >
> > When CONFIG_OF isn't set, we can optimize out dmard06_of_match as it
> > will never be used.
>
> NACK. There is a magic PRP0001 for ACPI case.
OK, I wasn't aware of this. As of_match_device() is a stub when
CONFIG_OF isn't set, I thought the table could never be used. But now I
see that the acpi subsystem accesses the table directly, so you are
correct, the optimization I suggested is bogus.
Now I'm curious, is there a well-defined subset of device names that
can be found in an ACPI table? If not, does that mean that any driver
with an OF entry could match, therefore of_match_ptr() should be
removed from the kernel entirely?
Another possibility would be to stub out of_match_ptr() only if neither
CONFIG_OF nor CONFIG_ACPI is set. But I'm not sure that would be worth,
as I expected either to be set on almost all kernels in practice
(except on s390x, but you wouldn't build any of these drivers there
anyway).
--
Jean Delvare
SUSE L3 Support
Powered by blists - more mailing lists