lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75VcGopXaksmvXP_vMM-iGK0o_g5Fw_F5zvH+PXcCUx_cDQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 26 Aug 2022 18:18:20 +0300
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To:     Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.de>
Cc:     linux-iio <linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
        Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iio:accel:dmard06: Optimize when CONFIG_OF isn't set

On Fri, Aug 26, 2022 at 1:46 PM Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.de> wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Aug 2022 23:12:43 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 25, 2022 at 3:54 PM Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.de> wrote:

...

> Now I'm curious, is there a well-defined subset of device names that
> can be found in an ACPI table? If not, does that mean that any driver
> with an OF entry could match,

Yes, anything can be matched by ACPI with any of the compatible strings.

> therefore of_match_ptr() should be
> removed from the kernel entirely?

In most cases yes, like for discrete components that can be connected
to any SoC on ACPI/DT/whatever platform. But for some cases it still
makes sense: platform is known to never be non-OF, component is known
to be used only on such platforms, etc.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ