[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YwjeL2SVmdRpoWb6@nvidia.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2022 11:52:31 -0300
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
To: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@...el.com>,
Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@...el.com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@...aro.com>,
Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>,
Eric Auger <eric.auger@...hat.com>,
Liu Yi L <yi.l.liu@...el.com>,
Jacob jun Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...el.com>,
Zhangfei Gao <zhangfei.gao@...aro.org>,
Zhu Tony <tony.zhu@...el.com>, iommu@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 07/17] iommu: Try to allocate blocking domain when
probing device
On Fri, Aug 26, 2022 at 08:11:31PM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote:
> Allocate the blocking domain when probing devices if the driver supports
> blocking domain allocation. Otherwise, revert to the previous behavior,
> that is, use UNMANAGED domain instead when the blocking domain is needed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>
> Tested-by: Zhangfei Gao <zhangfei.gao@...aro.org>
> Tested-by: Tony Zhu <tony.zhu@...el.com>
> ---
> drivers/iommu/iommu.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++------------
> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
This seems like a lot of overhead to allocate these things for every
group?
Why not add a simple refcount on the blocking domain instead and
allocate the domain on the pasid attach like we do for ownership?
Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists