[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YwjeW+nSIDkmmggd@nvidia.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2022 11:53:15 -0300
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
To: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@...el.com>,
Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@...el.com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@...aro.com>,
Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>,
Eric Auger <eric.auger@...hat.com>,
Liu Yi L <yi.l.liu@...el.com>,
Jacob jun Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...el.com>,
Zhangfei Gao <zhangfei.gao@...aro.org>,
Zhu Tony <tony.zhu@...el.com>, iommu@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 08/17] iommu: Make free of iommu_domain_ops optional
On Fri, Aug 26, 2022 at 08:11:32PM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote:
> So that the drivers are able to implement static singleton instance for
> some special domains. The blocking domain is an example. The driver has
> no need to allocate different memory for each blocking domain allocation
> request. Hence, no need for a free callback.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>
> Tested-by: Zhangfei Gao <zhangfei.gao@...aro.org>
> Tested-by: Tony Zhu <tony.zhu@...el.com>
> ---
> drivers/iommu/iommu.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
> index e985f4d5895f..630e1b64ed89 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
> @@ -1972,7 +1972,8 @@ void iommu_domain_free(struct iommu_domain *domain)
> if (domain->type == IOMMU_DOMAIN_SVA)
> mmdrop(domain->mm);
> iommu_put_dma_cookie(domain);
> - domain->ops->free(domain);
> + if (domain->ops->free)
> + domain->ops->free(domain);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(iommu_domain_free);
This patch is in the wrong order, it needs to be before the ARM patch
implementing the blocking domain
But looks OK
Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists