| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2022 12:13:53 +0300
From: Fedor Pchelkin <pchelkin@...ras.ru>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Daniel Starke <daniel.starke@...mens.com>
Cc: Fedor Pchelkin <pchelkin@...ras.ru>,
Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Alexey Khoroshilov <khoroshilov@...ras.ru>,
ldv-project@...uxtesting.org
Subject: [PATCH v2] tty: n_gsm: avoid call of sleeping functions from atomic context
Syzkaller reports the following problem:
BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/printk/printk.c:2347
in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 1, non_block: 0, pid: 1105, name: syz-executor423
3 locks held by syz-executor423/1105:
#0: ffff8881468b9098 (&tty->ldisc_sem){++++}-{0:0}, at: tty_ldisc_ref_wait+0x22/0x90 drivers/tty/tty_ldisc.c:266
#1: ffff8881468b9130 (&tty->atomic_write_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: tty_write_lock drivers/tty/tty_io.c:952 [inline]
#1: ffff8881468b9130 (&tty->atomic_write_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: do_tty_write drivers/tty/tty_io.c:975 [inline]
#1: ffff8881468b9130 (&tty->atomic_write_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: file_tty_write.constprop.0+0x2a8/0x8e0 drivers/tty/tty_io.c:1118
#2: ffff88801b06c398 (&gsm->tx_lock){....}-{2:2}, at: gsmld_write+0x5e/0x150 drivers/tty/n_gsm.c:2717
irq event stamp: 3482
hardirqs last enabled at (3481): [<ffffffff81d13343>] __get_reqs_available+0x143/0x2f0 fs/aio.c:946
hardirqs last disabled at (3482): [<ffffffff87d39722>] __raw_spin_lock_irqsave include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:108 [inline]
hardirqs last disabled at (3482): [<ffffffff87d39722>] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x52/0x60 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:159
softirqs last enabled at (3408): [<ffffffff87e01002>] asm_call_irq_on_stack+0x12/0x20
softirqs last disabled at (3401): [<ffffffff87e01002>] asm_call_irq_on_stack+0x12/0x20
Preemption disabled at:
[<0000000000000000>] 0x0
CPU: 2 PID: 1105 Comm: syz-executor423 Not tainted 5.10.137-syzkaller #0
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.12.0-1 04/01/2014
Call Trace:
__dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:77 [inline]
dump_stack+0x107/0x167 lib/dump_stack.c:118
___might_sleep.cold+0x1e8/0x22e kernel/sched/core.c:7304
console_lock+0x19/0x80 kernel/printk/printk.c:2347
do_con_write+0x113/0x1de0 drivers/tty/vt/vt.c:2909
con_write+0x22/0xc0 drivers/tty/vt/vt.c:3296
gsmld_write+0xd0/0x150 drivers/tty/n_gsm.c:2720
do_tty_write drivers/tty/tty_io.c:1028 [inline]
file_tty_write.constprop.0+0x502/0x8e0 drivers/tty/tty_io.c:1118
call_write_iter include/linux/fs.h:1903 [inline]
aio_write+0x355/0x7b0 fs/aio.c:1580
__io_submit_one fs/aio.c:1952 [inline]
io_submit_one+0xf45/0x1a90 fs/aio.c:1999
__do_sys_io_submit fs/aio.c:2058 [inline]
__se_sys_io_submit fs/aio.c:2028 [inline]
__x64_sys_io_submit+0x18c/0x2f0 fs/aio.c:2028
do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40 arch/x86/entry/common.c:46
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x61/0xc6
The problem happens in the following control flow:
gsmld_write(...)
spin_lock_irqsave(&gsm->tx_lock, flags) // taken a spinlock on TX data
con_write(...)
do_con_write(...)
console_lock()
might_sleep() // -> bug
As far as console_lock() might sleep it should not be called with
spinlock held.
The patch replaces tx_lock spinlock with mutex in order to avoid the
problem.
Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with Syzkaller.
Fixes: 32dd59f96924 ("tty: n_gsm: fix race condition in gsmld_write()")
Signed-off-by: Fedor Pchelkin <pchelkin@...ras.ru>
Signed-off-by: Alexey Khoroshilov <khoroshilov@...ras.ru>
---
v2->v1: sorry, now adapted patch from 5.10 to upstream
drivers/tty/n_gsm.c | 46 +++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/tty/n_gsm.c b/drivers/tty/n_gsm.c
index caa5c14ed57f..be62c601058d 100644
--- a/drivers/tty/n_gsm.c
+++ b/drivers/tty/n_gsm.c
@@ -248,7 +248,7 @@ struct gsm_mux {
bool constipated; /* Asked by remote to shut up */
bool has_devices; /* Devices were registered */
- spinlock_t tx_lock;
+ struct mutex tx_mutex;
unsigned int tx_bytes; /* TX data outstanding */
#define TX_THRESH_HI 8192
#define TX_THRESH_LO 2048
@@ -680,7 +680,6 @@ static int gsm_send(struct gsm_mux *gsm, int addr, int cr, int control)
struct gsm_msg *msg;
u8 *dp;
int ocr;
- unsigned long flags;
msg = gsm_data_alloc(gsm, addr, 0, control);
if (!msg)
@@ -702,10 +701,10 @@ static int gsm_send(struct gsm_mux *gsm, int addr, int cr, int control)
gsm_print_packet("Q->", addr, cr, control, NULL, 0);
- spin_lock_irqsave(&gsm->tx_lock, flags);
+ mutex_lock(&gsm->tx_mutex);
list_add_tail(&msg->list, &gsm->tx_ctrl_list);
gsm->tx_bytes += msg->len;
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&gsm->tx_lock, flags);
+ mutex_unlock(&gsm->tx_mutex);
gsmld_write_trigger(gsm);
return 0;
@@ -730,7 +729,7 @@ static void gsm_dlci_clear_queues(struct gsm_mux *gsm, struct gsm_dlci *dlci)
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dlci->lock, flags);
/* Clear data packets in MUX write queue */
- spin_lock_irqsave(&gsm->tx_lock, flags);
+ mutex_lock(&gsm->tx_mutex);
list_for_each_entry_safe(msg, nmsg, &gsm->tx_data_list, list) {
if (msg->addr != addr)
continue;
@@ -738,7 +737,7 @@ static void gsm_dlci_clear_queues(struct gsm_mux *gsm, struct gsm_dlci *dlci)
list_del(&msg->list);
kfree(msg);
}
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&gsm->tx_lock, flags);
+ mutex_unlock(&gsm->tx_mutex);
}
/**
@@ -1024,10 +1023,9 @@ static void __gsm_data_queue(struct gsm_dlci *dlci, struct gsm_msg *msg)
static void gsm_data_queue(struct gsm_dlci *dlci, struct gsm_msg *msg)
{
- unsigned long flags;
- spin_lock_irqsave(&dlci->gsm->tx_lock, flags);
+ mutex_lock(&dlci->gsm->tx_mutex);
__gsm_data_queue(dlci, msg);
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dlci->gsm->tx_lock, flags);
+ mutex_unlock(&dlci->gsm->tx_mutex);
}
/**
@@ -1283,13 +1281,12 @@ static int gsm_dlci_data_sweep(struct gsm_mux *gsm)
static void gsm_dlci_data_kick(struct gsm_dlci *dlci)
{
- unsigned long flags;
int sweep;
if (dlci->constipated)
return;
- spin_lock_irqsave(&dlci->gsm->tx_lock, flags);
+ mutex_lock(&dlci->gsm->tx_mutex);
/* If we have nothing running then we need to fire up */
sweep = (dlci->gsm->tx_bytes < TX_THRESH_LO);
if (dlci->gsm->tx_bytes == 0) {
@@ -1300,7 +1297,7 @@ static void gsm_dlci_data_kick(struct gsm_dlci *dlci)
}
if (sweep)
gsm_dlci_data_sweep(dlci->gsm);
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dlci->gsm->tx_lock, flags);
+ mutex_unlock(&dlci->gsm->tx_mutex);
}
/*
@@ -1994,14 +1991,13 @@ static void gsm_dlci_command(struct gsm_dlci *dlci, const u8 *data, int len)
static void gsm_kick_timer(struct timer_list *t)
{
struct gsm_mux *gsm = from_timer(gsm, t, kick_timer);
- unsigned long flags;
int sent = 0;
- spin_lock_irqsave(&gsm->tx_lock, flags);
+ mutex_lock(&gsm->tx_mutex);
/* If we have nothing running then we need to fire up */
if (gsm->tx_bytes < TX_THRESH_LO)
sent = gsm_dlci_data_sweep(gsm);
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&gsm->tx_lock, flags);
+ mutex_unlock(&gsm->tx_mutex);
if (sent && debug & 4)
pr_info("%s TX queue stalled\n", __func__);
@@ -2506,7 +2502,7 @@ static int gsm_activate_mux(struct gsm_mux *gsm)
INIT_WORK(&gsm->tx_work, gsmld_write_task);
init_waitqueue_head(&gsm->event);
spin_lock_init(&gsm->control_lock);
- spin_lock_init(&gsm->tx_lock);
+ mutex_init(&gsm->tx_mutex);
if (gsm->encoding == 0)
gsm->receive = gsm0_receive;
@@ -2538,6 +2534,7 @@ static void gsm_free_mux(struct gsm_mux *gsm)
break;
}
}
+ mutex_destroy(&gsm->tx_mutex);
mutex_destroy(&gsm->mutex);
kfree(gsm->txframe);
kfree(gsm->buf);
@@ -2609,6 +2606,7 @@ static struct gsm_mux *gsm_alloc_mux(void)
}
spin_lock_init(&gsm->lock);
mutex_init(&gsm->mutex);
+ mutex_init(&gsm->tx_mutex);
kref_init(&gsm->ref);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&gsm->tx_ctrl_list);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&gsm->tx_data_list);
@@ -2636,6 +2634,7 @@ static struct gsm_mux *gsm_alloc_mux(void)
}
spin_unlock(&gsm_mux_lock);
if (i == MAX_MUX) {
+ mutex_destroy(&gsm->tx_mutex);
mutex_destroy(&gsm->mutex);
kfree(gsm->txframe);
kfree(gsm->buf);
@@ -2791,17 +2790,16 @@ static void gsmld_write_trigger(struct gsm_mux *gsm)
static void gsmld_write_task(struct work_struct *work)
{
struct gsm_mux *gsm = container_of(work, struct gsm_mux, tx_work);
- unsigned long flags;
int i, ret;
/* All outstanding control channel and control messages and one data
* frame is sent.
*/
ret = -ENODEV;
- spin_lock_irqsave(&gsm->tx_lock, flags);
+ mutex_lock(&gsm->tx_mutex);
if (gsm->tty)
ret = gsm_data_kick(gsm);
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&gsm->tx_lock, flags);
+ mutex_unlock(&gsm->tx_mutex);
if (ret >= 0)
for (i = 0; i < NUM_DLCI; i++)
@@ -3012,7 +3010,6 @@ static ssize_t gsmld_write(struct tty_struct *tty, struct file *file,
const unsigned char *buf, size_t nr)
{
struct gsm_mux *gsm = tty->disc_data;
- unsigned long flags;
int space;
int ret;
@@ -3020,13 +3017,13 @@ static ssize_t gsmld_write(struct tty_struct *tty, struct file *file,
return -ENODEV;
ret = -ENOBUFS;
- spin_lock_irqsave(&gsm->tx_lock, flags);
+ mutex_lock(&gsm->tx_mutex);
space = tty_write_room(tty);
if (space >= nr)
ret = tty->ops->write(tty, buf, nr);
else
set_bit(TTY_DO_WRITE_WAKEUP, &tty->flags);
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&gsm->tx_lock, flags);
+ mutex_unlock(&gsm->tx_mutex);
return ret;
}
@@ -3323,14 +3320,13 @@ static struct tty_ldisc_ops tty_ldisc_packet = {
static void gsm_modem_upd_via_data(struct gsm_dlci *dlci, u8 brk)
{
struct gsm_mux *gsm = dlci->gsm;
- unsigned long flags;
if (dlci->state != DLCI_OPEN || dlci->adaption != 2)
return;
- spin_lock_irqsave(&gsm->tx_lock, flags);
+ mutex_lock(&gsm->tx_mutex);
gsm_dlci_modem_output(gsm, dlci, brk);
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&gsm->tx_lock, flags);
+ mutex_unlock(&gsm->tx_mutex);
}
/**
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists