[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220827020911.30641-1-shangxiaojing@huawei.com>
Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2022 10:09:11 +0800
From: Shang XiaoJing <shangxiaojing@...wei.com>
To: <mingo@...hat.com>, <peterz@...radead.org>,
<juri.lelli@...hat.com>, <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
<dietmar.eggemann@....com>, <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
<bsegall@...gle.com>, <mgorman@...e.de>, <bristot@...hat.com>,
<vschneid@...hat.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: <shangxiaojing@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH -next] sched/deadline: Move __dl_clear_params out of dl_bw lock
As members in sched_dl_entity are independent with dl_bw, move
__dl_clear_params out of dl_bw lock.
Signed-off-by: Shang XiaoJing <shangxiaojing@...wei.com>
---
kernel/sched/deadline.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/deadline.c b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
index 58ca9aaa9c44..7b15885c8608 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/deadline.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
@@ -431,8 +431,8 @@ static void task_non_contending(struct task_struct *p)
sub_rq_bw(&p->dl, &rq->dl);
raw_spin_lock(&dl_b->lock);
__dl_sub(dl_b, p->dl.dl_bw, dl_bw_cpus(task_cpu(p)));
- __dl_clear_params(p);
raw_spin_unlock(&dl_b->lock);
+ __dl_clear_params(p);
}
return;
--
2.17.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists