[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9498c691-2a85-b9b1-7852-8b362455b840@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2022 10:24:55 +0200
From: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>
To: Shang XiaoJing <shangxiaojing@...wei.com>, mingo@...hat.com,
peterz@...radead.org, juri.lelli@...hat.com,
vincent.guittot@...aro.org, dietmar.eggemann@....com,
rostedt@...dmis.org, bsegall@...gle.com, mgorman@...e.de,
vschneid@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] sched/deadline: Move __dl_clear_params out of dl_bw
lock
On 8/27/22 04:09, Shang XiaoJing wrote:
Why are y'all always setting "-next" to the subject?
> As members in sched_dl_entity are independent with dl_bw, move
> __dl_clear_params out of dl_bw lock.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shang XiaoJing <shangxiaojing@...wei.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...nel.org>
-- Daniel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists