linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH -next] sched/deadline: Move __dl_clear_params out of dl

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 29 Aug 2022 16:48:47 +0800
From:   shangxiaojing <shangxiaojing@...wei.com>
To:     Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>,
        <mingo@...hat.com>, <peterz@...radead.org>,
        <juri.lelli@...hat.com>, <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
        <dietmar.eggemann@....com>, <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        <bsegall@...gle.com>, <mgorman@...e.de>, <vschneid@...hat.com>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] sched/deadline: Move __dl_clear_params out of dl_bw
 lock


On 2022/8/29 16:24, Daniel Bristot de Oliveira wrote:
> On 8/27/22 04:09, Shang XiaoJing wrote:
>
> Why are y'all always setting "-next" to the subject?
i heard that "-next" means prefer to merge into linux-next branch first, 
the subsequent patches from me wont set "-next".
>> As members in sched_dl_entity are independent with dl_bw, move
>> __dl_clear_params out of dl_bw lock.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Shang XiaoJing <shangxiaojing@...wei.com>
> Reviewed-by: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...nel.org>
>
> -- Daniel

Thanks,

Shang XiaoJing