lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YwpldyOI5x1xgMoM@lunn.ch>
Date:   Sat, 27 Aug 2022 20:41:59 +0200
From:   Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To:     Pali Rohár <pali@...nel.org>
Cc:     Gregory Clement <gregory.clement@...tlin.com>,
        Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Marek Behún <kabel@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: turris-omnia: Add switch port 6 node

On Thu, Aug 25, 2022 at 02:21:02PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
> Switch port 6 is connected to eth0, so add appropriate device tree node for it.
> 
> Fixes: 26ca8b52d6e1 ("ARM: dts: add support for Turris Omnia")
> Signed-off-by: Pali Rohár <pali@...nel.org>
> ---
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/armada-385-turris-omnia.dts | 12 +++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/armada-385-turris-omnia.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/armada-385-turris-omnia.dts
> index f655e9229d68..8215ffb6a795 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/armada-385-turris-omnia.dts
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/armada-385-turris-omnia.dts
> @@ -463,7 +463,17 @@
>  				};
>  			};
>  
> -			/* port 6 is connected to eth0 */
> +			ports@6 {
> +				reg = <6>;
> +				label = "cpu";
> +				ethernet = <&eth0>;
> +				phy-mode = "rgmii-id";
> +
> +				fixed-link {
> +					speed = <1000>;
> +					full-duplex;
> +				};
> +			};

Hi Pali

I've not been following Vladimirs work on multiple CPU ports. Is it
clearly defined, both for old and new kernels, what happens where
there are multiple CPU ports defined?

      Andrew

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ