[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220826201941.de6ed957a0d6547b2d501c19@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2022 20:19:41 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Charan Teja Kalla <quic_charante@...cinc.com>
Cc: <mhocko@...e.com>, <david@...hat.com>, <vbabka@...e.cz>,
<pasha.tatashin@...een.com>, <shakeelb@...gle.com>,
<sieberf@...zon.com>, <sjpark@...zon.de>,
<william.kucharski@...cle.com>, <willy@...radead.org>,
<quic_pkondeti@...cinc.com>, <minchan@...gle.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5] mm: fix use-after free of page_ext after race with
memory-offline
On Fri, 26 Aug 2022 12:26:33 +0530 Charan Teja Kalla <quic_charante@...cinc.com> wrote:
> The below is one path where race between page_ext and offline of the
> respective memory blocks will cause use-after-free on the access of
> page_ext structure.
What are people's thoughts on a -stable backport? It looks like the
bug has been there for years and the means of hitting it are obscure
and the patch isn't minor, so I'm thinking no?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists