[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8ae5c383-1c04-e16e-83a6-26861640deb1@microchip.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2022 17:35:55 +0000
From: <Conor.Dooley@...rochip.com>
To: <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>, <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
<krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
<Daire.McNamara@...rochip.com>, <Shravan.Chippa@...rochip.com>
CC: <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>, <palmer@...belt.com>,
<aou@...s.berkeley.edu>, <Cyril.Jean@...rochip.com>,
<Lewis.Hanly@...rochip.com>, <Praveen.Kumar@...rochip.com>,
<wg@...es-embedded.de>, <Hugh.Breslin@...rochip.com>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/9] dt-bindings: riscv: microchip: document the aries
m100pfsevp
On 30/08/2022 18:30, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
>
> On 30/08/2022 19:59, Conor.Dooley@...rochip.com wrote:
>>>> w dts were
>>>> needed so that the gpio-hog could be set correctly. Out of curiosity, I can
>>>> have the same compatible in multiple devicetrees right? In that case, it
>>>> would just be "aries,m100pfsevp" here and I could put that in both?
>>>> Would make things easier..
>>>
>>> Depends, but I would say for this case rather not. The compatible should
>>> identify the board. If the boards are different, one compatible should
>>> not identify both of them. Imagine U-Boot (or something else) trying to
>>> match the DTS.
>>
>> It is the same board though, the way the bootloader works is that if it
>> detects an SD-card it will use that to boot from, and if not will fall back
>> to the emmc.
>
> Wait, I might miss that part. So this is exactly the same hardware with
> the same SoM/SoC, same eMMC and SD card, except that one has plugged
> this SD card (as it is hot-pluggable)?
yessir
Powered by blists - more mailing lists