[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f0cc5ea8-9fd8-dc77-e595-33973e315d28@collabora.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2022 10:14:49 +0200
From: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
To: Yong Wu <yong.wu@...iatek.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
Cc: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>, iommu@...ts.linux.dev,
iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
mingyuan.ma@...iatek.com, yf.wang@...iatek.com,
libo.kang@...iatek.com, chengci.xu@...iatek.com,
youlin.pei@...iatek.com, anan.sun@...iatek.com,
xueqi.zhang@...iatek.com, Guenter Roeck <groeck@...omium.org>,
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/6] iommu/mediatek: Add error path for loop of
mm_dts_parse
Il 24/08/22 08:43, Yong Wu ha scritto:
> The mtk_iommu_mm_dts_parse will parse the smi larbs nodes. if the i+1
> larb is parsed fail, we should put_device for the 0..i larbs.
>
> There are two places need to comment:
> 1) The larbid may be not linear mapping, we should loop whole
> the array in the error path.
> 2) I move this line position: "data->larb_imu[id].dev = &plarbdev->dev;"
> That means set data->larb_imu[id].dev before the error path.
> then we don't need "platform_device_put(plarbdev)" again while
> probe_defer case. All depend on "put_device" in the error path in error
> cases.
>
> Fixes: d2e9a1102cfc ("iommu/mediatek: Contain MM IOMMU flow with the MM TYPE")
> Signed-off-by: Yong Wu <yong.wu@...iatek.com>
> ---
> drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c
> index 9c5902207bef..f63d4210043d 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c
> @@ -1053,8 +1053,10 @@ static int mtk_iommu_mm_dts_parse(struct device *dev, struct component_match **m
> u32 id;
>
> larbnode = of_parse_phandle(dev->of_node, "mediatek,larbs", i);
> - if (!larbnode)
> - return -EINVAL;
> + if (!larbnode) {
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> + goto err_larbdev_put;
> + }
>
> if (!of_device_is_available(larbnode)) {
> of_node_put(larbnode);
> @@ -1067,14 +1069,16 @@ static int mtk_iommu_mm_dts_parse(struct device *dev, struct component_match **m
>
> plarbdev = of_find_device_by_node(larbnode);
> of_node_put(larbnode);
> - if (!plarbdev)
> - return -ENODEV;
> + if (!plarbdev) {
> + ret = -ENODEV;
> + goto err_larbdev_put;
> + }
> + data->larb_imu[id].dev = &plarbdev->dev;
>
> if (!plarbdev->dev.driver) {
> - platform_device_put(plarbdev);
> - return -EPROBE_DEFER;
> + ret = -EPROBE_DEFER;
> + goto err_larbdev_put;
> }
> - data->larb_imu[id].dev = &plarbdev->dev;
>
> component_match_add(dev, match, component_compare_dev, &plarbdev->dev);
> platform_device_put(plarbdev);
> @@ -1082,8 +1086,10 @@ static int mtk_iommu_mm_dts_parse(struct device *dev, struct component_match **m
>
> /* Get smi-(sub)-common dev from the last larb. */
> smi_subcomm_node = of_parse_phandle(larbnode, "mediatek,smi", 0);
> - if (!smi_subcomm_node)
> - return -EINVAL;
> + if (!smi_subcomm_node) {
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> + goto err_larbdev_put;
> + }
>
> /*
> * It may have two level smi-common. the node is smi-sub-common if it
> @@ -1097,8 +1103,10 @@ static int mtk_iommu_mm_dts_parse(struct device *dev, struct component_match **m
>
> pcommdev = of_find_device_by_node(smicomm_node);
> of_node_put(smicomm_node);
> - if (!pcommdev)
> - return -EINVAL;
> + if (!pcommdev) {
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> + goto err_larbdev_put;
> + }
> data->smicomm_dev = &pcommdev->dev;
>
> link = device_link_add(data->smicomm_dev, dev,
> @@ -1106,9 +1114,19 @@ static int mtk_iommu_mm_dts_parse(struct device *dev, struct component_match **m
> platform_device_put(pcommdev);
> if (!link) {
> dev_err(dev, "Unable to link %s.\n", dev_name(data->smicomm_dev));
> - return -EINVAL;
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> + goto err_larbdev_put;
> }
> return 0;
> +
> +err_larbdev_put:
> + /* id may be not linear mapping, loop whole the array */
> + for (i = 0; i < MTK_LARB_NR_MAX; i++) {
Since there may be a case in which the mapping is linear and we're doing teardown,
I think it would be sensible to loop the other way around instead, from
MTK_LARB_NR_MAX to 0.
Everything else looks good to me.
Cheers,
Angelo
> + if (!data->larb_imu[i].dev)
> + continue;
> + put_device(data->larb_imu[i].dev);
> + }
> + return ret;
> }
>
> static int mtk_iommu_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists