[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220830081457.118960-1-aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2022 13:44:57 +0530
From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.ibm.com>
To: linux-mm@...ck.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Cc: Wei Xu <weixugc@...gle.com>, Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>,
Yang Shi <shy828301@...il.com>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>,
Tim C Chen <tim.c.chen@...el.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Hesham Almatary <hesham.almatary@...wei.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>,
Alistair Popple <apopple@...dia.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>, jvgediya.oss@...il.com,
Bharata B Rao <bharata@....com>,
"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH mm-unstable] mm/demotion: Make toptier_distance inclusive upper bound of toptiers
Based on suggestion from Wei Xu <weixugc@...gle.com>, having an
inclusive upper bound is found simpler.
Fixes: mm/demotion: Update node_is_toptier to work with memory tiers
Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@...ux.ibm.com>
---
mm/memory-tiers.c | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/memory-tiers.c b/mm/memory-tiers.c
index c4bd6d052a33..c82eb0111383 100644
--- a/mm/memory-tiers.c
+++ b/mm/memory-tiers.c
@@ -179,7 +179,7 @@ bool node_is_toptier(int node)
toptier = true;
goto out;
}
- if (memtier->adistance_start < top_tier_adistance)
+ if (memtier->adistance_start <= top_tier_adistance)
toptier = true;
else
toptier = false;
@@ -361,7 +361,8 @@ static void establish_demotion_targets(void)
* abstract distance below the max value of this memtier
* is considered toptier.
*/
- top_tier_adistance = memtier->adistance_start + MEMTIER_CHUNK_SIZE;
+ top_tier_adistance = memtier->adistance_start +
+ MEMTIER_CHUNK_SIZE - 1;
break;
}
}
--
2.37.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists