[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMRc=McqfBSb+ZoD_WT-rWBqxqTCpogKUhO2uJr2R8dctTA1CA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2022 21:57:08 +0200
From: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
To: Francesco Dolcini <francesco.dolcini@...adex.com>
Cc: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
linux-iio <linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Input <linux-input@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] dt-bindings: gpio: stmpe: Remove node name requirement
On Tue, Aug 9, 2022 at 3:48 PM Francesco Dolcini
<francesco.dolcini@...adex.com> wrote:
>
> Hello Bartosz, can you pick this? Patches 1 and 2 were applied to MFD
> tree.
>
> On Tue, Jul 12, 2022 at 06:33:43PM +0200, Francesco Dolcini wrote:
> > STMPE driver does not require a specific node name anymore, only the
> > compatible is checked, update binding according to this.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Francesco Dolcini <francesco.dolcini@...adex.com>
> > ---
> > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio-stmpe.txt | 3 +--
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio-stmpe.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio-stmpe.txt
> > index a0e4cf885213..b33f8f02c0d7 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio-stmpe.txt
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio-stmpe.txt
> > @@ -8,8 +8,7 @@ Optional properties:
> > - st,norequest-mask: bitmask specifying which GPIOs should _not_ be requestable
> > due to different usage (e.g. touch, keypad)
> >
> > -Node name must be stmpe_gpio and should be child node of stmpe node to which it
> > -belongs.
> > +Node should be child node of stmpe node to which it belongs.
> >
> > Example:
> > stmpe_gpio {
> > --
> > 2.25.1
> >
>
Sorry, I was off most of August and missed this one. Now applied.
Bart
Powered by blists - more mailing lists