linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] drm/panel-edp: Fix typo in kerneldoc comment (appers=>appears)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Yw+/xRdODPBl26Eh@ravnborg.org>
Date:   Wed, 31 Aug 2022 22:08:37 +0200
From:   Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
To:     Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
Cc:     Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>, David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/panel-edp: Fix typo in kerneldoc comment
 (appers=>appears)

Hi Douglas,

On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 08:03:11AM -0700, Doug Anderson wrote:
> Sam,
> 
> On Wed, Jul 20, 2022 at 4:23 PM Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org> wrote:
> >
> > Ever since I got the spell-check working in my editor this one has
> > been bugging me. Fix it.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
> > ---
> >
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-edp.c | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-edp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-edp.c
> > index e6645d6e9b59..07a383dff548 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-edp.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-edp.c
> > @@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ struct panel_delay {
> >          * before the HPD signal is reliable. Ideally this is 0 but some panels,
> >          * board designs, or bad pulldown configs can cause a glitch here.
> >          *
> > -        * NOTE: on some old panel data this number appers to be much too big.
> > +        * NOTE: on some old panel data this number appears to be much too big.
> >          * Presumably some old panels simply didn't have HPD hooked up and put
> >          * the hpd_absent here because this field predates the
> >          * hpd_absent. While that works, it's non-ideal.
> 
> Maybe you'd be willing to give me an "Ack" for this stupid little
> patch so I can land it? ;-)
Certainly.
Acked-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>